2008
DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/12/031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bounding scalar operator dimensions in 4DCFT

Abstract: In an arbitrary unitary 4D CFT we consider a scalar operator φ, and the operator φ 2 defined as the lowest dimension scalar which appears in the OPE φ × φ with a nonzero coefficient. Using general considerations of OPE, conformal block decomposition, and crossing symmetry, we derive a theory-independent inequality [φ 2 ] ≤ f ([φ]) for the dimensions of these two operators. The function f (d) entering this bound is computed numerically. For, which shows that the free theory limit is approached continuously. We … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

29
1,813
1
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 892 publications
(1,848 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
29
1,813
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…We start with N = 500 and using the large N expansion value for ∆ σ 2 and our most accurate numerics we find a kink at (∆ φ , ∆ σ ) = (1.500409, 2.027) that is very close to the large N expansion values (∆ φ , ∆ σ ) = (1.500414, 2.022) for the critical theory. 5 We then examine N ≤ 40 and find a kink that disappears around 15 < N crit < 22 for a reasonable assumption of ∆ σ 2 , which is consistent with the large N expansion prediction of N crit < 35. We check that our choice of ∆ σ 2 does not qualitatively affect our answers for 6 ≤ N ≤ 40.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We start with N = 500 and using the large N expansion value for ∆ σ 2 and our most accurate numerics we find a kink at (∆ φ , ∆ σ ) = (1.500409, 2.027) that is very close to the large N expansion values (∆ φ , ∆ σ ) = (1.500414, 2.022) for the critical theory. 5 We then examine N ≤ 40 and find a kink that disappears around 15 < N crit < 22 for a reasonable assumption of ∆ σ 2 , which is consistent with the large N expansion prediction of N crit < 35. We check that our choice of ∆ σ 2 does not qualitatively affect our answers for 6 ≤ N ≤ 40.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…We denote the maximum derivative order by Λ (as in [34]) and the maximum spin by J max . The truncated constraint problem can then be rephrased as a semidefinite programing problem using the method developed in [5]. This problem can be solved efficiently by freely available software such as sdpa gmp [62].…”
Section: Conformal Bootstrap Numericsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…giving a quartically divergent contribution in S. 13 However, this contribution remains reasonably small if cut off at Λ ∼ 2M V , due to phase space suppression. In a more realistic setup, the AV formfactor would be softened giving an even smaller ∆S.…”
Section: Jhep03(2012)046mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, thinking in terms of gauge degrees of freedom may be misleading. One may try instead to use the language of Conformal Field Theory [13][14][15][16]. Conformal language is also indispensable in the context of strong EWSB models in warped extra dimensions [17].…”
Section: Jhep03(2012)046mentioning
confidence: 99%