1971
DOI: 10.1287/opre.19.7.1586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bounding Distributions for a Stochastic Acyclic Network

Abstract: Where the durations of the activities in an acyclic scheduling network are random variables, this paper obtains upper and lower bounding distributions for the activity starting- and finishing-time probability distributions, as well as upper and lower bounds for the expected starting and finishing time of each network activity, and for expected network resource flows. The tightness of the bounds for various networks is examined, and a computational experience with the methods is reported.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional work related to the problem of determining the expected project makespan with stochastic task durations includes papers by Van Slyke (1963) who suggests Monte Carlo Simulation as a viable method for constructing the project makespan distribution, Martin (1965) who defines a network reduction approach for determining the makespan Probability Density Function (PDF), Dodin (1984) who develops a heuristic approach to finding the k most critical paths through a project network, Dodin (1985a) who develops an approximation for the makespan CDF, Kleindorfer (1971); Robillard and Trahan (1976) and Dodin (1985b) who obtain bounds for the makespan PDF and Kulkarni and Adlakha (1986) who develop the makespan distribution for a project network with exponentially distributed task times using a Markov Pert Networks (MPN. Many of these, including Dodin (1985a), developed approximations using discretization of continuous density functions, simplifying the convolution of task densities.…”
Section: Fig 1: It Project Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional work related to the problem of determining the expected project makespan with stochastic task durations includes papers by Van Slyke (1963) who suggests Monte Carlo Simulation as a viable method for constructing the project makespan distribution, Martin (1965) who defines a network reduction approach for determining the makespan Probability Density Function (PDF), Dodin (1984) who develops a heuristic approach to finding the k most critical paths through a project network, Dodin (1985a) who develops an approximation for the makespan CDF, Kleindorfer (1971); Robillard and Trahan (1976) and Dodin (1985b) who obtain bounds for the makespan PDF and Kulkarni and Adlakha (1986) who develop the makespan distribution for a project network with exponentially distributed task times using a Markov Pert Networks (MPN. Many of these, including Dodin (1985a), developed approximations using discretization of continuous density functions, simplifying the convolution of task densities.…”
Section: Fig 1: It Project Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, many techniques for statistical timing analysis are based on those developed in the operations research and management science literature, e.g., criticality analysis (Bowman 1995) and distribution bounding (Kleindorfer 1971, Ludwig et al 2001). …”
Section: Statistical Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Criticality (4)(5)(6)(7)(8) 0.000 0.143 Table 1: Project statistics for the project from Van Slyke [19].…”
Section: Cpm Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second example is a larger project taken from Kleindorfer [8]. The project consists of forty activities distributed over fifty one paths.…”
Section: Example 2: Comparison With Other Worst Case Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%