2008
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-08-04589-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bounded $H_\infty $-calculus for pseudodifferential operators and applications to the Dirichlet-Neumann operator

Abstract: Abstract. Operators of the form A = a(x, D) + K with a pseudodifferential symbol a(x, ξ) belonging to the Hörmander class S m 1,δ , m > 0, 0 ≤ δ < 1, and certain perturbations K are shown to possess a bounded H ∞ -calculus in Besov-Triebel-Lizorkin and certain subspaces of Hölder spaces, provided a is suitably elliptic. Applications concern pseudodifferential operators with mildly regular symbols and operators on manifolds of low regularity. An example is the Dirichlet-Neumann operator for a compact domain wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…be its realization on H 1 2 (T 1 ). Then there is some λ0 ≥ 0 such that λ0 + A(t0) possesses a bounded H ∞ -calculus due to [20,Theorem 4.10]. This implies that for every A(t0) has maximal L p -regularity on every finite time interval and for every 1 < p < ∞ due to [19,Theorem 3.2].…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…be its realization on H 1 2 (T 1 ). Then there is some λ0 ≥ 0 such that λ0 + A(t0) possesses a bounded H ∞ -calculus due to [20,Theorem 4.10]. This implies that for every A(t0) has maximal L p -regularity on every finite time interval and for every 1 < p < ∞ due to [19,Theorem 3.2].…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e.g. Escher and Seiler , can be or has been included for these boundary value problems. (It was possible to include C*s in the regularity study for the restricted fractional Laplacian in using Johnsen .)…”
Section: Further Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark A.3. In fact, by applying the general results of [8] for pseudo-differential operators with nonsmooth symbols, it follows that −iµ(·, D x ) admits a bounded H ∞ calculus in H s (R d ), s ∈ [0, 1). In this sense, the properties of iµ(·, D x ) stated in Theorem A.2 themselves are not essentially new.…”
Section: A Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%