2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1902.11067
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bounded cohomology of transformation groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2) is, essentially, the same formula that appears in [2], as well as in [10] and other places. Minor differences in appearance are the result of different conventions in the definition of (bounded) cohomology.…”
Section: The Transfer Induced By a Left-cofinite Couplingmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…2) is, essentially, the same formula that appears in [2], as well as in [10] and other places. Minor differences in appearance are the result of different conventions in the definition of (bounded) cohomology.…”
Section: The Transfer Induced By a Left-cofinite Couplingmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…In all cases the proof strategy is to meet the requirements of the following lemma. While its part i is directly taken from [2], our new results in degree > 3 rely on part ii. The trick of applying the Kronecker pairing to compensate for the lack of a Künneth formula in bounded cohomology was previously used in [7].…”
Section: Proof Of the Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There is few results on the third bounded cohomology [5,13]. Recently, Brandenbursky and Marcinkowski [3] proved that EH 3 b (Diff Ω (M )) is uncountably infinitedimensional for a complete Riemannian manifold M with a volume form Ω with a certain condition on π 1 (M ). Corollary 1.2 does not covered by their result since π 1 (D 2 ) is trivial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%