2018
DOI: 10.1002/jee.20219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary Spanning and Engineering: A Qualitative Systematic Review

Abstract: Background Engineers are often expected to span organizational, cultural, stakeholder, geographic, temporal, and other boundaries. Yet, few studies on boundary spanning have appeared in the engineering education literature, suggesting the need for improved theoretical and conceptual foundations to guide empirical studies of boundary spanning in engineering. Purpose To develop a more comprehensive understanding of boundary spanning, this study addresses five research questions: (a) What types of boundaries have… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
(333 reference statements)
2
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We used Boyatzis's (1998) thematic analysis technique to compile all mentions of instructor strategies to aid implementation of active learning and categorize these excerpts into certain strategies. This technique uses both deductive and inductive coding processes (Creswell & Creswell, 2017;Jesiek, Mazzurco, Buswell, & Thompson, 2018).…”
Section: Analysis Procedures For Coding Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used Boyatzis's (1998) thematic analysis technique to compile all mentions of instructor strategies to aid implementation of active learning and categorize these excerpts into certain strategies. This technique uses both deductive and inductive coding processes (Creswell & Creswell, 2017;Jesiek, Mazzurco, Buswell, & Thompson, 2018).…”
Section: Analysis Procedures For Coding Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it does not appear surprising that in complex contexts characterized by uncertainty and change, there is a need of individuals who can bridge the divide between differ-ent parties (within or between organizations) and thereby connect different worlds [12,36]. Research on inter-organizational collaboration as well as in organizational behavior and strategic management has long recognized the value of such boundary spanning individuals [13,14,18,37,38], although sometimes referred to by other names such as networker, broker, collaborator, cupid, civic entrepreneur, boundroid, sparkplug or collabronaut [39]. Boundary spanners need not be individuals with a formally designated or nominated role; the roles may also be performed in practice by individuals without such nomination [11,15].…”
Section: Boundary Spanners As Agents Of Change In Sustainable Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They should be visionaries and frontrunners, openminded and able to look beyond their own domain or working area. Such individuals are essentially boundary spanners-individuals with specific relational skills and competences to bridge diverging perspectives as well as facilitate the dissemination and integration of new information and knowledge into an organization [10][11][12][13][14]. Being a boundary spanner also entails navigating power dynamics in managing complexity, understanding motives, roles and responsibilities in "the big picture", having insights into organizational strategies Sustainability 2021, 13, 8073 2 of 17 and visions, as well as knowing how and who to influence in order to obtain authority and legitimacy to drive change in an organizational context [10,11,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result of this phase was organized in a list that includes the analyzed papers with their associated characteristics (Appendix). In the inductive phase, I identified some specific "themes in each topic area with particular emphasis on characterizing the ones most prevalent" (p. 385) [22], after three iterations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%