1985
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(1985)111:1(29)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary Shear in Smooth Rectangular Ducts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These comparisons showed that the MBM is comparable with these existing methods. When the estimated shear stress by MBM was compared with Lawrence (1960), Knight and Patel (1985) and Leutheusser (1963), it presents this method works well and agrees with these existing data. No empirical coefficient or assumption is involved in the method.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These comparisons showed that the MBM is comparable with these existing methods. When the estimated shear stress by MBM was compared with Lawrence (1960), Knight and Patel (1985) and Leutheusser (1963), it presents this method works well and agrees with these existing data. No empirical coefficient or assumption is involved in the method.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…8 and Fig. 9 shows the comparison between the boundary shear stress obtained by MBM and other researchers' measured results, including Lawrence [19], Leutheusser [20] and Knight and Patel [1]. It is seen that the relative bed shear stress…”
Section: Mbm Application To Smooth Closed Duct Flowsmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Knight and Patel (1985) calculated boundary shear stress distributions in fully developed turbulent flows in smooth rectangular ducts and extracted the following equation:…”
Section: Data Description Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presented equation for a trapezoidal channel could not predict acceptable values for wall shear stress, and with RMSE of 0.1826, it exhibited low precision for predicting wall shear stress. The equations proposed for smooth ducts presented by Knight and Patel (1985) and Rhodes and Knight (1994) had the highest error values (RMSE of 0.2694 and 0.2554, respectively) and indicated the equations' poor accuracy in predicting wall shear stress.…”
Section: Comparison Between the Best Model And Other Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%