1999
DOI: 10.1088/0268-1242/14/5/318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary scattering in wet-etched InAs/GaSb heterostructure wires: with and without magnetic field

Abstract: We report the observation of boundary scattering in damage-free wires made from InAs/GaSb quantum wells. Fabrication of very long wires has enabled us to observe boundary scattering contribution to the resistivity of these wires both with and without a magnetic field. A very well-defined region of suppression of both field-induced and zero-field boundary scattering was observed. These effects were seen to become more pronounced as the width of the wires was reduced. Differences from boundary scattering in GaAs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3(a), the MR(𝐵 ‖ ) includes regions of field-induced boundary scattering, suppression of zero-field boundary scattering and recovery of the classic positive. [15] In the absence of a magnetic field, the electrons suffer the impurities scattering to exhibit a large zero-field resistance. Compared with the zero-field resistance, the field-induced boundary scattering causes a 1.2% positive MR(𝐵 ‖ ) at about 1.2 T. With the increasing 𝐵 ‖ field, the backscattering suppression amounts to 6% negative MR(𝐵 ‖ ) at around 3.2 T. The negative MR(𝐵 ‖ ) implies that only forward scattering is very effective in reducing zero-field boundary scattering.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3(a), the MR(𝐵 ‖ ) includes regions of field-induced boundary scattering, suppression of zero-field boundary scattering and recovery of the classic positive. [15] In the absence of a magnetic field, the electrons suffer the impurities scattering to exhibit a large zero-field resistance. Compared with the zero-field resistance, the field-induced boundary scattering causes a 1.2% positive MR(𝐵 ‖ ) at about 1.2 T. With the increasing 𝐵 ‖ field, the backscattering suppression amounts to 6% negative MR(𝐵 ‖ ) at around 3.2 T. The negative MR(𝐵 ‖ ) implies that only forward scattering is very effective in reducing zero-field boundary scattering.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%