2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11858-015-0683-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary objects and boundary crossing for numeracy teaching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, only an activity theory approach seems to have been taken thus far. Venkat and Winter (2015) claimed that an activity theory approach could be used to investigate how teachers handled boundary objects in classrooms promoting numeracy learning.…”
Section: Boundary Objects and Numeracy Across The Curriculummentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, only an activity theory approach seems to have been taken thus far. Venkat and Winter (2015) claimed that an activity theory approach could be used to investigate how teachers handled boundary objects in classrooms promoting numeracy learning.…”
Section: Boundary Objects and Numeracy Across The Curriculummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to illustrate their argument, Venkat and Winter (2015) drew on excerpts from a preservice teacher's use of a map in the South African school subject, Mathematical Literacy (SA DBE, 2011; see Section 2.1.2 for further details about Mathematical Literacy), and identified possible issues when boundary objects are treated differently in mathematical and contextual activities. A map is used to represent the location of places and can be used for estimating distances in contextual activities (e.g., history and other subjects), whereas the same artefact is a Cartesian plane in mathematics.…”
Section: Boundary Objects and Numeracy Across The Curriculummentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations