2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2014.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary lubrication: Influence of the size and structure of inorganic fullerene-like MoS2 nanoparticles on friction and wear reduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
101
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In one test the oil in the test holder was stirred for the first and third hour. The unstirred sample showed almost complete loss of friction reduction after about half an hour while in the other stirring enabled friction to remain low and even to recover friction reduction after this was lost during an unstirred period [237]. Figure 19.…”
Section: Discussion -Nanoparticle Additivesmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In one test the oil in the test holder was stirred for the first and third hour. The unstirred sample showed almost complete loss of friction reduction after about half an hour while in the other stirring enabled friction to remain low and even to recover friction reduction after this was lost during an unstirred period [237]. Figure 19.…”
Section: Discussion -Nanoparticle Additivesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Figure 19. Loss of IF-MoS 2 friction reduction during rubbing and its recovery by stirring [237] For a nanoparticle to be effective in controlling friction three requirements must be fulfilled; (i) the dispersed particles must enter the contact in sufficient quantities; (ii) once between the surfaces the particles must impart low friction; (ii) some adhesion of the particles to the surface is probably necessary.…”
Section: Discussion -Nanoparticle Additivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[27,28] By contrast, MoS 2 /WS 2 nano with the larger particles size (≈90 nm) decrease friction and wear by carrying some of the load between contact surfaces ( Figure 12B-b), but most them tend to be pushed away with some being squeezed into the contact interface, demonstrating their diminishing tribological advantage as compared to MoS 2 /WS 2 QDs. [19,[27][28][29] The corresponding wear surfaces of lower steel disks lubricated by pure PAG, and PAG containing 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 wt% MoS 2 /WS 2 QDs were further checked with 3D surface mapping profilometer. As shown in Figure 7A,a-a' and B,a- Figure 7A,d-d', or B,d-d').…”
Section: Tribological Performances Of Mos 2 /Ws 2 Qdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it appears that the above-mentioned mechanisms were derived based on experiments with model fluids [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] or on tests under dry contact conditions, mostly on steel surfaces. Some recent studies have explored the potentials of nanoparticles with non-ferrous surfaces such as diamond-like carbon (DLC) coatings [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12]. Examples of how nanoparticle size, structure or structural defect could affect their tribological properties have been explored by Rabaso et al [13]. These studies reported that nanoparticles with structural defects, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%