44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 2006
DOI: 10.2514/6.2006-920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary Layer Stability Analysis of Mars Science Laboratory Aeroshell

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3,4 Blunt re-entry capsules with a sphere-cone shaped forebody like the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) support modal growth of boundary-layer instabilities on the conical part of the heat shield strong enough to trigger laminarturbulent transition. [5][6][7] Configurations where the forebody consists of a spherical segment only, like the Apollo capsule or the Orion Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV), require a much higher Reynolds number for the onset of modal disturbance growth. 8 Owing to the strong bow shock, the boundary-layer edge Mach number remains subsonic or slightly supersonic on the spherical heat shield, which excludes the possibility of second mode amplification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 Blunt re-entry capsules with a sphere-cone shaped forebody like the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) support modal growth of boundary-layer instabilities on the conical part of the heat shield strong enough to trigger laminarturbulent transition. [5][6][7] Configurations where the forebody consists of a spherical segment only, like the Apollo capsule or the Orion Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV), require a much higher Reynolds number for the onset of modal disturbance growth. 8 Owing to the strong bow shock, the boundary-layer edge Mach number remains subsonic or slightly supersonic on the spherical heat shield, which excludes the possibility of second mode amplification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the design of future returning space vehicles, those correlations should be replaced by the methods based on stability theory and transient growth considerations as demanded by Reshotko [2]. So far, stability analyses have only been performed for the MSL capsule, where transition was dominated by ¦rst-mode and cross- §ow instabilities [3,4] and recently by Theiss et al [5] for an Apollo-shaped capsule. Because of a strong favourable pressure gradient, the boundary layer in the latter investigation did not feature any ampli¦ed modal disturbances at similar freestream conditions to [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transition stability of this geometry has already been shown to be highly marginal 36 , and it is not clear that the parameter Re θ /M is a valid transition criterion for this flowfield. However, it is hoped that it will provide at least a qualitative insight and that it is consistent with the approximate nature of this entire analysis.…”
Section: Impact Of Frozen Energy On Transition Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%