1980
DOI: 10.1115/1.3244265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary Layer Regime for Laminar Free Convection between Horizontal Circular Cylinders

Abstract: The steady, buoyancy-driven, laminar motion induced in the annulus of two horizontal, concentric, circular cylinders by a difference in the boundary temperatures is studied analytically in the large Rayleigh number limit. The flowfield is divided into five physically distinct regions: (1) an inner free convection boundary layer near the inner cylinder, (2) an outer free convection boundary layer near the outer cylinder, (3) a vertical plume above the inner cylinder, (4) a stagnant region below the inner cylind… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In experiments on coaxial cylinders, Beckman [65] found that the ratio should be > 56 for negligible error; Jische and Farschi [66] suggested a value much greater than 10; Hessami et al [67] proposed that the ratio should be 100 for 1% error; and Mahony et al [68] suggested that the ratio should be > 10 for Ra > 10 3 . Clemes et al [3] found negligible difference between the heat transfer with a ratio of 15, compared with a ratio of 30. In studies of the effect of confining vertical walls on the natural convective heat transfer from heat transfer engineering horizontal cylinders, the following values of the ratio s /D were proposed for negligible error, where s is the spacing between the walls: »20 [28], > 30 [34], > 20 [36], > 20 [69], and > 10 [38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In experiments on coaxial cylinders, Beckman [65] found that the ratio should be > 56 for negligible error; Jische and Farschi [66] suggested a value much greater than 10; Hessami et al [67] proposed that the ratio should be 100 for 1% error; and Mahony et al [68] suggested that the ratio should be > 10 for Ra > 10 3 . Clemes et al [3] found negligible difference between the heat transfer with a ratio of 15, compared with a ratio of 30. In studies of the effect of confining vertical walls on the natural convective heat transfer from heat transfer engineering horizontal cylinders, the following values of the ratio s /D were proposed for negligible error, where s is the spacing between the walls: »20 [28], > 30 [34], > 20 [36], > 20 [69], and > 10 [38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A complete solution of the steady laminar boundary layer regime in a horizontal annulus is due to Jischke and Farshchi [13]. Recently, an expression for the flow and temperature fields was derived by Desrayaud et al [6], for the pseudo-diffusive regime in the limit R/1, for pure fluids and binary mixtures.…”
Section: Fundamental Studiesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As depicted in Fig. 3, from [13], the boundary layer regime can be subdivided into five different flow regions, with a thin boundary layer developing around the inner cylinder, and giving rise to a buoyant plume in the top region of the annulus; for large values of R, the dynamics of the plume is the leading phenomenon for transition to turbulent flow. Along the cooler, outer cylinder walls, the fluid redescends, forming a second, downward boundary layer.…”
Section: General Flow Characteristics Of the Concentric Annulusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, for Pr ~ 1, a thermal-type instability should arise near the top of the annul us. Jischke and Farshchi (1980) studied the boundary-layer regime for laminar free convection between 2-D horizontal annuli at the large Rayleigh number limit. They divided the flow field into five physically distinct regions, valid for the high Rayleigh number limiting condition.…”
Section: R^ Andn-1 R = 0[(eg)-1] (23)mentioning
confidence: 99%