2020
DOI: 10.1029/2019ea000703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary Layer Parameterizations to Simulate Fog Over Atlantic Canada Waters

Abstract: In this study, a series of fog events that occurred near Halifax, Canada, during 20 June to 31 July 2016 are investigated using the Weather Research and Forecasting Model Version 3.8.1 (WRF), in comparison with in situ and satellite remotely sensed observations from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer. We evaluate five planetary boundary layer (PBL) schemes available in WRF. Results show that these five PBL schemes lead to overestimates in liquid water content, especially the nonlocal schemes, an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both parameterizations of microphysics and boundary layer were chosen as a suitable performance for computational cost and meteorological reproduction (e.g. Chen et al, 2020; Nakanishi & Niino, 2009; Pithani et al, 2019). The gravitational settling of fog droplets was calculated using the fog deposition scheme at the ground surface (Katata et al, 2008) and Duynkerke's (1991) scheme in the atmosphere.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Both parameterizations of microphysics and boundary layer were chosen as a suitable performance for computational cost and meteorological reproduction (e.g. Chen et al, 2020; Nakanishi & Niino, 2009; Pithani et al, 2019). The gravitational settling of fog droplets was calculated using the fog deposition scheme at the ground surface (Katata et al, 2008) and Duynkerke's (1991) scheme in the atmosphere.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the liquid water path (LWP) was used to detect fog layers from possible low clouds located below a few kilometres (e.g. Chen et al, 2020): LWP=z0z1CWCitalicdz Here, CWC is the cloud water content (kg∙m −3 ). The LWP (kg∙m −2 ) is vertical integration of the CWC from the surface of z 0 to approximately 2000 m AGL of the model height z 1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chen et al (2020) note problems with too low visibility from their WRF calculations coupled to the Kunkel (1984) visibility equation (vis =ln(ε)/β with the extinction coefficient (km -1 ), β = 144.7 W 0.88 where W is in g m -3 ). The contrast threshold, ε was given as 0.02 by Kunkel but is set to 0.05, as recommended by the WMO (Boudala et al 2012;Chen et al 2020). In the GSD algorithm used in NCEP's Unified Post Processor version 2.2, the Kunkel result is used with ε = 0.02 for visibility reductions in clouds, plus additional effects of aerosol, rainfall and humidity.…”
Section: Visibility Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ground-based observations of the boundary layer have higher precision than reanalysis datasets. Previous studies have reported the limitations of ERA-5 in simulating the atmospheric boundary layer (Chen et al 2020a). The boundary layer is crucial in the atmosphere as it helps in dispersing the atmospheric pollutants (Kotthaus et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%