2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.csr.2005.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary layer flow and net sediment transport beneath asymmetrical waves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
35
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with Holmedal & Myrhaug (2006) who, using a k-ε model, showed there was no significant effect of a/k s on the near-bed residual for velocity-skewed flow. They indicated that although the time-averaged stress will increase with increasing roughness, leading to a larger negative mean flow (in the case of an infinite tunnel), the finite length of the tunnel will lead to a stronger return flow with increasing roughness, which consequently does not lead to significant changes in the residual velocity profile.…”
Section: A Van Der a T O'donoghue A G Davies And J S Ribbesupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is consistent with Holmedal & Myrhaug (2006) who, using a k-ε model, showed there was no significant effect of a/k s on the near-bed residual for velocity-skewed flow. They indicated that although the time-averaged stress will increase with increasing roughness, leading to a larger negative mean flow (in the case of an infinite tunnel), the finite length of the tunnel will lead to a stronger return flow with increasing roughness, which consequently does not lead to significant changes in the residual velocity profile.…”
Section: A Van Der a T O'donoghue A G Davies And J S Ribbesupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The mechanism giving rise to the residual velocity is the asymmetry in turbulence intensity between the two flow half-cycles, which leads to the generation of a time-averaged, height-dependent stress within the boundary layer (Trowbridge & Madsen 1984;Davies & Li 1997;Holmedal & Myrhaug 2006). Figure 11 presents the residual velocity profiles for all of the present 12 experiments.…”
Section: Time-averaged Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(16). A similar technique was used by Holmedal and Myrhaug (2006). Here we instead forced the average horizontal velocity to match u ∞ , similar to how the physical water tunnel is forced.…”
Section: Boundary Conditions and Forcingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intermediate transport models are also empirical transport formulas, but phase-lag effects are included in a parameterized way (Ahmed and Sato, 2003;Camenen and Larson, 2005;Dibajnia and Watanabe, 1992;Dohmen-Janssen et al, 2002). Full unsteady sediment transport models are based on a full time-dependent simulation of both velocities and concentrations during the wave cycle at different elevations above the bed (Fredsøe, 1984;Guizien et al, 2003;Hassan and Ribberink, 2010;Holmedal and Myrhaug, 2006;Holmedal and Myrhaug, 2009;Kranenburg et al, 2013;Ribberink and Al-Salem, 1995;Ruessink et al, 2009;Uittenbogaard et al, 2001). The process-based unsteady models are advanced approaches.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation For Sediment Transport Under Combined Wmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models can be divided into three different classes (Hassan and Ribberink, 2010;: empirical quasi-steady transport models, intermediate transport models, and fully unsteady sediment transport models (process based). Fully unsteady sediment transport models are based on a time-dependent simulation of both velocities and concentrations during the wave cycle at different elevations above the bed (Fredsøe, 1984;Guizien et al, 2003;Hassan and Ribberink, 2010;Holmedal and Myrhaug, 2006;Kranenburg et al, 2013;Ribberink and Al-Salem, 1995;Ruessink et al, 2009;Uittenbogaard et al, 2001). The process-based unsteady models are based on more advanced approaches, and this study focuses on this kind of model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%