1977
DOI: 10.1007/bf00121968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary-layer diffusion modelling: The Gaussian plume approach versus the spectral solution

Abstract: The equation of turbulent diffusion is solved for a vertical area source within the planetary boundary layer. The traditional Gaussian-plume approach is compared with the spectral solution of the diffusion equation used together with the barotropic boundary-layer model of Lettau and Dabberdt (1970). The results of the numerical computations are presented and the differences between the solutions are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the line source solution can be integrated to obtain sources of strip, area, and volume type [6,37]. Others have considered horizontal diffusion coefficients that depend on other variables such as wind speed [29]. Lin and Hildemann [20] provide an extensive summary of various plume-type solutions that are available in the literature.…”
Section: Other Generalizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the line source solution can be integrated to obtain sources of strip, area, and volume type [6,37]. Others have considered horizontal diffusion coefficients that depend on other variables such as wind speed [29]. Lin and Hildemann [20] provide an extensive summary of various plume-type solutions that are available in the literature.…”
Section: Other Generalizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each real and virtual source is assumed to give a Gaussian vertical distribution. Nitsche et al (Ni77) and Prahm et al (Pr78) have developed models based on the gradienttransfer theory for the calculation of the vertical distribution of matter released from an elevated point source.…”
Section: Calculation Of Atmospheric Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 99%