1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf00706797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary-layer depth and entrainment zone characterization with a boundary-layer profiler

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
186
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(190 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
186
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be noticed that the sharp gradient in height profile of θ (gray line in 1st column panel of Fig. 5b), indicating the top of the boundary-layer (Angevine et al, 1994), shows a good correlation with the LLJ core height. The significant change in wind speed with a clear oscillation in the level of maximum wind during the course of the day can be seen in the right-most column panels of Fig.…”
Section: General Llj Characteristic Features Over Gadankimentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be noticed that the sharp gradient in height profile of θ (gray line in 1st column panel of Fig. 5b), indicating the top of the boundary-layer (Angevine et al, 1994), shows a good correlation with the LLJ core height. The significant change in wind speed with a clear oscillation in the level of maximum wind during the course of the day can be seen in the right-most column panels of Fig.…”
Section: General Llj Characteristic Features Over Gadankimentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The sharp decrease in ε above the boundary layer indicates the diminishing of turbulent eddies of sizes comparable to half of radar wavelength above the boundary layer. So, the sharp gradient feature of these parameters observed around the boundary layer top can be used to estimate the boundary layer depth (Angevine et al, 1994;White, 1993;Sandra Jacoby-Koaly et al, 2002). Hence, this gradient feature, from here on, is utilized to find the boundary-layer depth/top from sole radar measurements.…”
Section: Site System and Data Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2c). Herein, a method proposed by Angevine et al (1994Angevine et al ( , 1998) is used. The distributed software from the manufacturer did not provide reasonable PBL heights and was therefore not further included in the analysis.…”
Section: Wind Profilermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a boundary layer topped by boundary layer clouds, the cloud top coincides with the height at which turbulence stops, and boundary layer height detection is aided by the sensitivity to clouds. However, for clouds above the boundary layer, the cloud top is significantly different from the CBLH, and it is difficult to extract the information needed to define the CBLH from the backscatter profile [30].…”
Section: Convective Condensation Level Limitermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such conditions, the cloud layer can be regarded as the upper portion of the boundary layer [1,27]. However, for continental boundary layers topped by cumulus clouds, the CBLH is distinct from the elevated cloud layers above the cumulus [30,31]. In such situations, clouds are not part of the boundary layer, and determination of the CBLH requires further consideration if we are to separate boundary layer clouds from clouds that are not part of the boundary layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%