2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10958-009-9284-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary estimates for solutions to the two-phase parabolic obstacle problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From here on we will no longer, with the exception of Lemma 16, need any explicit calculations using the curl operator and we will therefore write R n instead of R 3 . Some of the ideas in this section to control the growth of blow up sequences comes from [2]. Proposition 2.…”
Section: Flatness Of the Free Boundarymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From here on we will no longer, with the exception of Lemma 16, need any explicit calculations using the curl operator and we will therefore write R n instead of R 3 . Some of the ideas in this section to control the growth of blow up sequences comes from [2]. Proposition 2.…”
Section: Flatness Of the Free Boundarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But due to Korn's inequality both conditions are equivalent. If we denote Π = {x; x 3 = 0} and Λ u = {x ∈ Π; u 3 (x) = 0} then it is easy to see that the minimizers solves the following Euler-Lagrange equations (2) Lu ≡ ∆u + 2+λ 2 ∇div(u) = 0 in R 3…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remark 3.2. More detailed information about Caffarelli's monotonicity formula and its local rescaled version can be found in book [18] and in papers [14,19], respectively.…”
Section: Historical Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…x 2 1 2 is caloric in R n+1 ∩ {t ≤ 0} and has quadratic growth with respect to x and at most linear growth with respect to t. By the Liouville theorem (see Lemma 2.1 in [AUS1]), the function v 0 , and, consequently, the function u 0 , is a polynomial of degree 2, i.e., there exist constants a i ≥ 0 and c ≥ 0 such that the exact representation (2.10) is valid.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%