2007
DOI: 10.1128/mcb.00305-07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary Element-Associated Factor 32B Connects Chromatin Domains to the Nuclear Matrix

Abstract: Chromatin domain boundary elements demarcate independently regulated domains of eukaryotic genomes. While a few such boundary sequences have been studied in detail, only a small number of proteins that interact with them have been identified. One such protein is the boundary element-associated factor (BEAF), which binds to the scs boundary element of Drosophila melanogaster. It is not clear, however, how boundary elements function. In this report we show that BEAF is associated with the nuclear matrix and map … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are a variety of possible mechanisms that could be involved by which BEAF might affect promoter accessibility by positively or negatively influencing nucleosome modifications, structure, or positioning. Another interesting possibility is related to the report that nuclear matrix preparations retain 25% of BEAF (48). Both Su(Hw) and CTCF have also been reported to be retained in nuclear matrix preparations, leading to the proposal that they function in part by organizing chromatin into loop domains (10,17,66).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are a variety of possible mechanisms that could be involved by which BEAF might affect promoter accessibility by positively or negatively influencing nucleosome modifications, structure, or positioning. Another interesting possibility is related to the report that nuclear matrix preparations retain 25% of BEAF (48). Both Su(Hw) and CTCF have also been reported to be retained in nuclear matrix preparations, leading to the proposal that they function in part by organizing chromatin into loop domains (10,17,66).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Perhaps binding would have been detected if we had used different sequences from the peak regions. Another possibility is that BEAF binds better in vivo, perhaps due to phosphorylation (29,48) or interactions with other, unknown, proteins. Identification of potential BEAF binding sites in BEAF binding regions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…44,45 Another TE, the Hat element, derived an insulated protein (BEAF-32 of Drosophila) that connects the specialized chromatin structure to the adjacent chromatin elements and the nuclear matrix. 46 Other degenerate TE sequences, such as miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITEs), are often transcribed and contain terminal inverted repeats. These MITEs can produce handle RNA, which could theoretically be processed into siRNA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1C) analysis. The nuclear versus NuMat proportion of RNA, DNA, and proteins is yet another relatively convenient parameter for reliable preparation (21). Retention of RNA (ϳ45%), a small fraction of DNA (ϳ0.92%), and proteins (ϳ10%) in the NuMat preparation from Drosophila cells/embryos is considered acceptable (21).…”
Section: Numat Preparation and Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NuMat and its associated proteins are likely to be involved in the nuclear transport and may also play a vital role by providing a scaffold for the transport machinery. In addition, post-translational modifications appear to be important for NuMat proteins (21,22). The presence of protein kinases in the NuMat may be relevant in this context.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%