Boundary effects on electrophoretic motion of colloidal spheres

Abstract

An analysis is presented for electrophoretic motion of a charged non-conducting sphere in the proximity of rigid boundaries. An important assumption is that κa → ∞, where a is the particle radius and κ is the Debye screening parameter. Three boundary configurations are considered: single flat wall, two parallel walls (slit), and a long circular tube. The boundary is assumed a perfect electrical insulator except when the applied field is directed perpendicular to a single wall, in which case the wall is assumed to have a uniform potential (perfect conductor). There are three basic effects causing the particle velocity to deviate from the value given by Smoluchowski's classic equation: first, a charge on the boundary causes electro-osmotic flow of the suspending fluid; secondly, the boundary alters the interaction between the particle and applied electric field; and, thirdly, the boundary enhances viscous retardation of the particle as it tries to move in response to the applied field. Using a method of reflections, we determine the particle velocity for a constant applied field in increasing powers of λ up to O(λ6), where λ is the ratio of particle radius to distance from the boundary. Ignoring the O(λ0) electro-osmotic effect, the first effect attributable to proximity of the boundary is O(λ3) for all boundary configurations, and in cases when the applied field is parallel to the boundaries the electrophoretic velocity is proportional to ζp − ζw, the difference in zeta potential between the particle and boundary.

Hydrodynamic Boundary Effects on Thermophoresis of Confined Colloids

“…At all distances, the diffusion coefficient is more strongly reduced than the drift velocity. The inset shows the same at linear scale, thus highlighting the linear law D ∝ĥ and the logarithmic corrections for u at short distances A slightly larger correction, with a prefactor 5 8 instead of 1 2 , was found for the electrophoretic mobility [16]. The difference of 1 8 arises from the deformation of the electric field by the low-permittivity particle and by the conducting wall.…”

dc electrokinetic transport of cylindrical cells in straight microchannels

“…7 As the Reynolds number of the electrokinetic flow in the present study is less than 0.02, the fluid inertia is neglected. Therefore, the mass and momentum conservation of the fluid outside the EDL are then expressed by…”

“…[2][3][4][5][6] The success of these electrically controlled microfluidic devices for particle transport relies on a comprehensive understanding of fluid and particle behavior in these devices. However, most existing theoretical [7][8][9][10][11] and experimental [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] studies on the electrokinetic transport in microfluidic devices have been performed exclusively on spherical particles. In fact, a large amount of particles used in microfluidic applications, such as biological entities 1 and synthetic nanowires, 20,21 is nonspherical.…”

Apparent Slip Due to the Motion of Suspended Particles in Flows of Electrolyte Solutions

“…Furthermore, since the conductivity σ and the viscosity µ only appear in (30) as their product, the estimate (33) shows that the apparent slip length (30) is in fact independent of the fluid viscosity.…”