1993
DOI: 10.1051/jp1:1993212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary effects in a two-dimensional Abelian sandpile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, on the boundary of the lattice only this operator determines the correlations of all other heights [22,23].…”
Section: Correlation Functions and The Continuous Limitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, on the boundary of the lattice only this operator determines the correlations of all other heights [22,23].…”
Section: Correlation Functions and The Continuous Limitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The way these conflicting requirements of particle conservation and locally critical DP-like evolution are satisfied in our model is that the critical steady state develops a spatial structure. The density r, and hence P 1 , are not uniform throughout the system, but vary from layer to layer [11]. Let r͑ᐉ͒ be the average density of sites with nonzero height in the ᐉth layer.…”
Section: (Received 28 April 1997)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…+l6 prob l23ll +leprob 22 (8.4) %e note that a similar series is encountered in calculating the probability that on deleting a bond at random in a spanning tree, exactly s, sites get disconnected [11] (10) Tj F + 1 j for 1~j~n~ (12) Experimentation with small systems shows that this is usually true. (Its general validity was erroneously claimed in [2]. )…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Only recently has it been possible to calculate the fractional number of sites having different heights in the steady state in two dimensions [8]. It is also known that correlations between sites with minimum allowed height vary as r in the critical state, where r is the separation between sites, in the bulk, and on the surface [9,10]. However, so far it has not been possible to relate any of the exponents referring to distribution of sizes of avalanches to known exponents.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%