2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0013-7944(02)00223-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary effect on concrete fracture and non-constant fracture energy distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
89
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
89
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The first one is the case of a crack propagating towards a boundary. The fracture process zone (FPZ) is constrained by the boundary of specimen [8] and the energy required to propagate the crack should change. The specimen boundary will limit the development of the FPZ, and therefore, leads to a reduced fracture energy and strength [8,7,9,10].…”
Section: D Plate In Tensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one is the case of a crack propagating towards a boundary. The fracture process zone (FPZ) is constrained by the boundary of specimen [8] and the energy required to propagate the crack should change. The specimen boundary will limit the development of the FPZ, and therefore, leads to a reduced fracture energy and strength [8,7,9,10].…”
Section: D Plate In Tensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These F mechanisms cause the so-called tension softening of the material and can be particularly regarded as interpretation of the crack bending around aggregates, friction of cracks face and aggregate interlock, blinding of crack tip in pores, crack branching and others [1,3]. There were many attempts to capture/deal with the phenomena of the size/shape/boundary effect on fracture properties of quasi-brittle materials proposed with success in the last more than twenty years [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]; however, the applicability/validity of the suggested remedies are usually rather limited and not general. This is true also for the standardized work-of-fracture method for determination of fracture energy of concrete [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is true also for the standardized work-of-fracture method for determination of fracture energy of concrete [15]. The value of fracture energy determined by this method is strongly dependent on the specimen size and geometry [9,10,12] This phenomenon is caused by the change in the size and shape of the FPZ during crack propagation, from which the change of energy dissipated in this area results. This change is determined by the distance and the position of the crack tip and the FPZ in relation to free surfaces of the specimen [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A bilinear distribution of the local fracture energy along the crack path is therefore proposed. Duan et al [15,12,10] proposed also a bilinear fracture energy distribution where G f is function of the specimen width ( Fig. 1)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore the energy dissipated due to fracture per unit length (or unit width) described by the stressstrain curves is constant. As the softening behaviour is nonlinear, the Levenberg-Marquardt [12,13] algorithm is used to perform inverse analysis. Only a part of the Load-CMOD curves is fitted in order to estimate the size-independent fracture energy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%