2014
DOI: 10.1109/tnet.2013.2254124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary Cutting for Packet Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The representative algorithms are Hierarchical Intelligent Cuttings[15], HyperCuts[16], Recursive Flow Classification[17], GroupCuts[18], unsupervised co-clustering algorithm[19] and so on.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The representative algorithms are Hierarchical Intelligent Cuttings[15], HyperCuts[16], Recursive Flow Classification[17], GroupCuts[18], unsupervised co-clustering algorithm[19] and so on.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the construction of a decision tree of the HiCuts algorithm, an extensive number of cuts expend more stockpiling, and a little number of cuts causes slower search performance [18]. There are no.…”
Section: Hicutsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was introduced in 2003.In this algorithm multiple fields are considered at a time for cutting. Hence which results in fast searching time and decision trees are shorter in depth [18].…”
Section: Hypercutsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A rule database is stored in an external memory because of its size as the number of rules increases. Since an access to an external memory takes 10-20 times longer than that to an on-chip memory [2], the packet classification performance directly relates to the number of external memory accesses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%