1968
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/1/9/310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary conditions in wall-stabilized arc columns

Abstract: Conduction and breakdown have been studied in the boundary regions of wall-stabilized arc columns for arc currents up to 50 A in N2, Ar, He, air and SF6 at atmospheric pressure, and for stabilizing hole diameters of 5 and 4 mm. In the case of SF6 no electrons could be drawn to a positively charged disk, and this is shown to be due to the unusual property of an SF6 plasma below 4000°K, namely that it comprises only positive and negative ions (S+ and F−). Estimates of temperature on the plasma side of the bounda… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also note that no ion saturation current was found. This behaviour is similar to those presented in wall-stabilized arc experiments with (Hill & Jones, 1979) or without externally imposed axial gas flow (George & Richards, 1968) …”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Also note that no ion saturation current was found. This behaviour is similar to those presented in wall-stabilized arc experiments with (Hill & Jones, 1979) or without externally imposed axial gas flow (George & Richards, 1968) …”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The residual volume was assumed to be constant in the calculating of net fluxes. This residual volume was determined before the series of experiments by a phenol red dye dilution technique using the mean of 20 replicate estimations (George, 1968).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method of current collection of the probes was discovered to be diffuse, rather than that due to localized spot collection. Thus the finite probe thickness caused it to collect a net electron current at voltages lower then the floating potential [20].…”
Section: Probe Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primarily, one must be certain that the electron current portions of the probe characteristics have equal slopes through their respective points of floating potential up to the value of electron current drawn from the pair. The single probe characteristics can also tell one the maximum value of electron current which can safely be drawn without causing the probe plasma sheath to break down [20].…”
Section: Probe Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation