2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2017.12.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary conditions for fractional diffusion

Abstract: This paper derives physically meaningful boundary conditions for fractional diffusion equations, using a mass balance approach. Numerical solutions are presented, and theoretical properties are reviewed, including well-posedness and steady state solutions. Absorbing and reflecting boundary conditions are considered, and illustrated through several examples. Reflecting boundary conditions involve fractional derivatives. The Caputo fractional derivative is shown to be unsuitable for modeling fractional diffusion… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

3
84
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
3
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we will show that the eigenvalues of the matrix C have negative real parts. According to the Gershgorin theorem [26], the eigenvalues of the matrix C lie in the disks centered at c i, i with radii ∑ N−1 j=1,j≠i |c i,j |. When 1 ≤ i ≤ N − 2, according to Lemma 2, we have…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, we will show that the eigenvalues of the matrix C have negative real parts. According to the Gershgorin theorem [26], the eigenvalues of the matrix C lie in the disks centered at c i, i with radii ∑ N−1 j=1,j≠i |c i,j |. When 1 ≤ i ≤ N − 2, according to Lemma 2, we have…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu and Hou [25] developed an implicit finite difference method for fractional advection-dispersion equations with fractional derivative BCs. In [26], an explicit Euler scheme was proposed and numerical results presented for space-fractional diffusion equations with absorbing or reflecting BCs. Stable, consistent explicit and implicit Euler methods were generalized to two-sided fractional diffusion, and stability was established in [27].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A completely different approach for solving (1) for p ≡ 1 with zero Dirichlet boundary conditions is employed in [12], where the authors obtained the viscosity solutions. Further discussion was made in [3] and [13] where the authors compare the problems with diffusive flux modeled by the Caputo and the Riemann-Liouville derivative and carry a numerical analysis.In the present paper we will present the results concerning solvability of (1) by means of the semigroup theory. At first, we will focus our attention on the case where p ≡ 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the non-locality of the fractional operator, the local BCs may not be suitable depending on the type of fractional derivative, hence non-local/fractional BCs have been considered in some other works, for instance, see [45,20,47,40,39,21]. Moreover, by imposing the no-flux BCs, namely, homogeneous fractional Neumann boundary conditions, we can recover the mass conservation [2,3,18]. However, the numerical implementation of non-local BCs is not straightforward and requires special treatment in order to preserve the accuracy of the numerical method used, especially in high order methods such as spectral Galerkin methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Conservative R-L FDEs, i.e., D The definitions of the fractional operators I s p , D s p , C D s p , s > 0 can be found in (2.13) and (2.14). From physical point of view, the FNBCs (R-L or Caputo) is the reflecting (no-flux) BCs, and the homogeneous classical Dirichlet BCs is the absorbing BCs [2]. For the R-L problem with FDBCs, although the physical meaning may not be clear, it is mathematically interesting, see [7] for the one-sided FDEs or [22] for the Riesz FDEs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%