2020
DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2020.1846767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundaries of collaboration – the case of a temporary housing complex for refugees in Sweden

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The complexities and consequences of such organising processes for LMIS have only recently received more attention (e.g. Brorström & Diedrich, 2020 ; Diedrich, 2017 ). However, we lack knowledge of how the organising of LMIS for refugees has been affected by the Covid-19 pandemic, and the potential consequences for refugees and organisers of support.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The complexities and consequences of such organising processes for LMIS have only recently received more attention (e.g. Brorström & Diedrich, 2020 ; Diedrich, 2017 ). However, we lack knowledge of how the organising of LMIS for refugees has been affected by the Covid-19 pandemic, and the potential consequences for refugees and organisers of support.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on how support for refugees is organised in practice, involving a plethora of organisations, is limited, with few exceptions (see e.g. Ortlieb et al, 2021 ; Brorström & Diedrich, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, it is increasingly challenging to improve integration with fewer resources. Although innovative methods and new tools could help, a more collaborative approach is needed that draws on public‐private cooperation (Brorström & Diedrich, 2020; Lee & Szkudlarek, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some focus on refugees' experiences with organisations (Senthanar et al, 2020), while others concentrate on organisations' views on refugees (Diedrich & Styhre, 2008) and the structure of such organisations (Barabasch et al, 2016). Brorström & Diedrich (2020), for example, analyse the tensions and boundaries that occur in collaboration of different organisations involved in LMI in the Swedish context. Research also examines the effects of LMI support, ranging from limited to positive effects over a longer period (see Battisti et al, 2019;Ortlieb, Eggenhofer-Rehart, et al, 2021).…”
Section: A Relational View On Organising Labour Market Integration Of...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Openness is about boundaries and boundary work, and these, according to many, reflect the essence of organizing and structuring organizational life (e.g., Langley et al, 2019;Paulsen and Hernes, 2003;Santos and Eisenhardt, 2005). The organizational literature on boundaries is increasingly moving away from the entitative conception of boundaries as given and stable fixed demarcations of groups and organizations as bounded entities in favor of a processual view that conceives boundaries as continuously socially constructed and interpreted, emergent and dynamic, inherently tension-laden, and centrally constitutive of the ongoing process of organizing (Brorström and Diedrich, 2022;Glimmerveen et al, 2020;Lamont and Molnár, 2002;Langley et al, 2019;Quick and Feldman, 2014;Zietsma and Lawrence, 2010). In the processual view, boundaries can both connect and divide (Quick and Feldman, 2014) and are subject to human agency through boundary work, the "purposeful individual and collective effort to influence boundaries (…); demarcations; and distinctions affecting groups, occupations, and organizations" (Langley et al, 2019, p. 704).…”
Section: Conceptualization: Openness As Boundary Workmentioning
confidence: 99%