The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12648-020-01908-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bound states and scattering phase shift of relativistic spinless particles with screened Kratzer potential

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When we have knowledge of the energy eigenvalues and wave function expressions for quantum particles within a system, we gain a comprehensive understanding of that quantum mechanical system. Several authors have continued to work on solving the Schrödinger wave equation in the presence of various physical potentials, including the Yukawa potential, Morse potential, Manning-Rosen potential, diatomic molecular potential, extended Cornell potential, Kratzer-Fues potential, trigonometric potential, repulsive inverse square potential among them (see, for examples [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] and references there in). The exact and approximate eigenvalue solutions of the Schrödinger equation (SE) with these interacting potentials are important in different branches of physics and chemistry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When we have knowledge of the energy eigenvalues and wave function expressions for quantum particles within a system, we gain a comprehensive understanding of that quantum mechanical system. Several authors have continued to work on solving the Schrödinger wave equation in the presence of various physical potentials, including the Yukawa potential, Morse potential, Manning-Rosen potential, diatomic molecular potential, extended Cornell potential, Kratzer-Fues potential, trigonometric potential, repulsive inverse square potential among them (see, for examples [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] and references there in). The exact and approximate eigenvalue solutions of the Schrödinger equation (SE) with these interacting potentials are important in different branches of physics and chemistry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tietz potential [12], Yukawa potential [13,14], attractive radial potential [15], a general potential [16,17], anharmonic Eckart potential [18], screened Kratzer potential [19], Hulthen potential [20], hyperbolic potential [21,22], Varshni potential [23], Hellmann potential [24], inverse quadratic Yukawa potential [25], Rosen-Morse potential [26], Woods-Saxon potential [27] and many more. In addition, some combined potential models that have used to obtain solutions are Hulthen-Yukawa potential [28], Hulthen-Coulomb potential [29],…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the DKP equation is more comprehensive than the KG and Proca equations due to its more complex structure (Nedjadi and Barrett, 1993; Scattering and bound state solutions to the wave equation are of great importance in quantum mechanics because the wave functions obtained from these solutions contain all the information needed to describe the entire quantum system. Therefore, there are many studies using different methods on physical potentials related to the relativistic and the non-relativistic particle equations (Taş and Havare, 2017;Taş, Aydoğdu, and Salti, 2017;Taş and Havare, 2018;Taş, Aydoğdu and Saltı, 2018;Yanar, Taş, Saltı and Aydoğdu, 2020;Edet, Amadi, Okorie, Taş, Ikot and Rampho, 2020;Okorie, Taş, Ikot, Osobonye and Rampho, 2021). In recent years, many studies have been conducted to DOI: 10.29132/ijpas.1369826 334 consider different interaction types for various representation of the DKP equation (Taş, 2021;Hassanabadi, Forouhandeh, Rahimov, Zarrinkamar and Yazarloo, 2012;Hamzavi and Ikhdair, 2013;Zarrinkamar, Rajabi, Yazarloo and Hassanabadi, 2013;Bahar, 2013;Bahar, and Yasuk, 2013;Onate, Ojonubah, Adeoti, Eweh and Ugboja, 2014;Ikot, Molaee, Maghsoodi, Zarrinkamar, Obong and Hassanabadi, 2015;Zarrinkamar, Panahi and Rezaei, 2016;Oluwadare and Oyewumi, 2017;Oluwadare and Oyewumi, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%