1984
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(84)90918-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bound state M1 transitions in sd-shell nuclei

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ground-state-transition width is lower than that reported by Ref. [19] but agrees well with the more recent value of Ref. [18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The ground-state-transition width is lower than that reported by Ref. [19] but agrees well with the more recent value of Ref. [18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The state at E x = 106 47 keV has been seen in two bremsstrahlung experiments [18,19]. Because of the amount of background in these experiments only the strong ground-statetransition was observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For sd shell nuclei, the role of collective motion is insignificant; therefore, the M 1 resonance clearly manifests itself in these nuclei. To date, the position and fine structure of the magnetic dipole resonance (MDR) in eveneven (4N and 4N + 2n) sd shell nuclei have been sufficiently well studied [3,4]. It has also been established that the main mechanism responsible for the MDR excitation is the transitions between spinorbit partners [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also been established that the main mechanism responsible for the MDR excitation is the transitions between spinorbit partners [2]. To explain the reduction in the total strength and MDR fragmentation in these nuclei, the Nilsson model [4], the configuration-mixing shell model [3], and the Hartree-Fock method [5] were successfully used. Consideration of the effect of pairing correlations on the position and energyweighted strength of giant multipole resonances leads to more complete agreement between the predictions of different theoretical models and experimental data [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%