2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2005.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bound sets for biobjective combinatorial optimization problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
77
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To compute the reference set, we use the notion of ideal set [17], which is a lower bound of the Pareto front [10]. The ideal set is defined as the best potential Pareto front that can be produced from a minimal complete set of extreme supported efficient solutions.…”
Section: Reference Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compute the reference set, we use the notion of ideal set [17], which is a lower bound of the Pareto front [10]. The ideal set is defined as the best potential Pareto front that can be produced from a minimal complete set of extreme supported efficient solutions.…”
Section: Reference Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Gandibleux and Klamroth () studied cardinality bounds for the MOKP based on weighted sum scalarizations. They showed that these bounds can be used to reduce the feasible set of the biobjective MOKP. Ehrgott and Gandibleux () introduced the concept of bound sets for MOCO problems. Indeed, well‐known bounds for multiobjective problems are the ideal point (lower bound) and the nadir point (upper bound) but first of all these bounds are not easy to compute, especially the nadir point, and second these values are very far from the Pareto front.…”
Section: The Multiobjective Knapsack Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…r The average distance D 1 and maximal distance D 2 (to be minimized) (Czyzak and Jaszkiewicz, 1998;Ulungu et al, 1999) between the points of a reference set and the points of Z N , by using the Euclidean distance. Ideally, the reference set is Z N itself, but generally it is not available; otherwise, it can be the nondominated points existing among the union of various sets Z N generated by several methods, or an upper bound of Z N (Ehrgott and Gandibleux, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A formulation of the vertex method appears in Pulkkinen (2006). For general concepts on bound sets, see Ehrgott and Gandibleux (2007).…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%