2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10915-022-01784-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bound-preserving Flux Limiting for High-Order Explicit Runge–Kutta Time Discretizations of Hyperbolic Conservation Laws

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental order of convergence (EOC) is above 2.0 if no limiting is performed and approximately 1.75 otherwise. Further improvements can be achieved by using less restrictive bounds, as proposed in [37]. The remarkably similar convergence behavior of the FC-L and DC schemes and the larger absolute errors of the SC method indicate that the choice of the local bounds has a stronger impact on the accuracy of slope-limited approximations to smooth solutions than the way in which these bounds are enforced in our methods.…”
Section: Steady Circular Advectionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The experimental order of convergence (EOC) is above 2.0 if no limiting is performed and approximately 1.75 otherwise. Further improvements can be achieved by using less restrictive bounds, as proposed in [37]. The remarkably similar convergence behavior of the FC-L and DC schemes and the larger absolute errors of the SC method indicate that the choice of the local bounds has a stronger impact on the accuracy of slope-limited approximations to smooth solutions than the way in which these bounds are enforced in our methods.…”
Section: Steady Circular Advectionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…To preserve the high accuracy and DMP property of the space discretization, time integration may need to be performed using a flux-corrected Runge-Kutta method of sufficiently high order. The first representatives of such methods were recently developed in [37,42]. In summary, the proposed methodology can be extended to high-order space-time discretizations but many additional aspects must be taken into account to reap the potential benefits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fundamental mathematical property of any reasonable numerical scheme for nonlinear systems of hyperbolic conservation laws that was not investigated in this paper at all was the invariant domain preserving property (IDP), such as the positivity of density and entropy. Future work will consider provably IDP extensions of our methods, making use of the mathematical techniques presented in the seminal work of Guermond and Popov et al concerning provably invariant domain preserving schemes [31,[57][58][59] and in the work of Kuzmin et al [7,[65][66][67] concerning bound-preserving algebraic flux limiters and slope limiters for high order continuous and discontinuous Galerkin finite element schemes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In what follows, we propose ω = ω(r) so that this property is fulfilled for C ≤ 1. For larger Courant numbers, to preserve the TVD property, we have to consider l i ∈ [0, 1], see later their definition inspired by flux-corrected type methods [22,11].…”
Section: Linear Advection Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of discontinuous solutions we propose a predictor-corrector procedure to find solution dependent values of the parameter for which the scheme is Total Variation Diminishing (TVD). For the case of Courant number larger than one, in general, additional limiting must be used, which we propose in a form of flux-corrected transport scheme [11,22]. The system of algebraic equations is solved efficiently with only one forward and one backward sweep using the fast sweeping method [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%