2006
DOI: 10.1002/polb.20871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bound carbonyls in PMMA adsorbed on silica using transmission FTIR

Abstract: The fraction of directly-bound carbonyls of surface-adsorbed poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) was determined using transmission Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The small size of the silica used allowed these measurements to be made directly in the transmission mode from dried casts deposited on KBr salt plates. Curve fitting of the carbonyl-stretching region allowed the estimation of both the relative amounts and also the relative ratio of the absorption coefficients for the free and bound carb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
47
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
47
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The broadening of the T g is an important characteristic of a multi‐component material, such as adsorbed polymer, and is due to a loss in the cooperative large‐amplitude motions . The presence of a strong interaction between the polymer and the substrate, such as H‐bonding on the surface has been demonstrated with FTIR on the carbonyl peak of PMMA on silica . The stretching frequency of the bound carbonyls was shifted to lower frequency when PMMA was adsorbed on silica.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The broadening of the T g is an important characteristic of a multi‐component material, such as adsorbed polymer, and is due to a loss in the cooperative large‐amplitude motions . The presence of a strong interaction between the polymer and the substrate, such as H‐bonding on the surface has been demonstrated with FTIR on the carbonyl peak of PMMA on silica . The stretching frequency of the bound carbonyls was shifted to lower frequency when PMMA was adsorbed on silica.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This ratio can be expressed as a function of the experimental observable, r , as: fnormalB=mpB/mnormalp=mpB/mnormalp=mpB/mnormalp=1/(1+ rΔCpB/ΔCpA) where the ratio is the same, regardless of how the amount of polymer is normalized (i.e., per mass of silica, mass in sample, or per surface area). The fraction of tightly‐bound polymer may then be compared to other measurements …”
Section: Bound‐segment Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peak areas of the bound and free carbonyl resonances of adsorbed PEVAc and PVAc obtained using OriginPro 8.6 software were used to fit the data to the model developed by Kulkeratiyut et al in 2006 . Based on this model the relative intensities would be expected to fit the following equation: Mnormalt=Mnormalb+(Anormalf/Anormalb)XMnormalb where M t is the total adsorbed amount of the polymer, M b is the mass of the polymer segments which are bound to the silica surface, A f and A b are the absorbances corresponding to the free carbonyl resonances and bound carbonyl resonances, respectively, and X is the ratio of the molar absorption coefficients of the bound and free carbonyl resonances.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the results in Table , insight can be gained on the structure of the adsorbed copolymer. M b for a particular polymer represents the mass of the polymer segments of the bound carbonyls . The value of M b is a hypothetical mass of the polymer with carbonyls covering the silica surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From these, the bound fraction of carbonyl groups, p , was calculated from eq p=|Anormalb/X[]|Anormalb/X+Anormalf where X is molar extinction coefficient ratio of bound to free carbonyls, A f is the intensity of the free carbonyl band, and A b is that of the bound carbonyl band . This estimation requires knowledge of the adsorption coefficients of the bound and free carbonyl or their ratio denoted as X in the equation above . The value of X for PLMA was determined to be 11.9 ± 2.0 using FTIR‐ATR (see Supporting Information) and had been previously estimated as X = 11.1 ± 2.9 using transmission mode FTIR .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%