Bouncing back or bouncing forward? Simulating urban resilience

Abstract

While the direct physical effects of an urban catastrophe are relatively straightforward to assess, indirect and longterm impact on the urban system is more circumspect. A large-scale shock such as an earthquake derails the complex urban system from its equilibrium path onto an unknown trajectory. Consequently, assessing the effect of policy intervention that aims to mitigate this shock and increase urban resilience is fraught with complexity. This paper presents the implementation of dynamic agent-based simulation to test long-run effects of a hypothetical earthquake in Jerusalem, Israel. It focuses on investigating the effectiveness of policy choices aimed at restoring the urban equilibrium. Cities are found to have a self-organising market-based mechanism that strives to attain a new equilibrium. They therefore may not always bounce back -they may also bounce forward. Decision-makers, engineers, emergency and urban planners need to be cognizant of this tendency when designing policy interventions.Otherwise, well-intentioned efforts may inhibit urban rejuvenation and delay the onset of city recovery.

Tourism and Hospitality industry resilience during the Covid-19 pandemic: Evidence from England

“…constant change and no singular stable state). Grinberger and Felsenstein (2014) discuss similar tensions in terms of 'bouncing back' (to a former stable equilibrium) or 'bouncing forwards' (i.e. various potential new trajectories) from urban shocks.…”

Engineering Resilient Complex Systems: The Necessary Shift Toward Complexity Science

“…As the recovery progresses, core goals are being supplemented and replaced by an extended goal set pertaining to normal functioning of the system. This extended set may be the same as the original set of goals in the long before phase, as the system "bounces back" to its original state [72], or "forward" to an adapted state, resulting in delivery of a new extended set of goals [73], [74]. To achieve the transition from core to an extended set of goals, the system can reconfigure, repair, or replace itself or one of its subsystems.…”

Participatory Disaster Recovery Simulation Modeling for Community Resilience Planning

“…It appears that only one disaster recovery model explicitly represents the influence of post-event natural capital dynamics (Frazier et al 2013). There are several models that relate multiple types of community capital Chang 2006, 2011;Frazier et al 2013;Grinberger and Felsenstein 2014;Santos et al 2014).…”