2002
DOI: 10.2140/pjm.2002.202.459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bouligand dimension and almost Lipschitz embeddings

Abstract: In this paper we present some new properties of the metric dimension defined by Bouligand in 1928 and prove the following new projection theorem: Let dim b (A − A) denote the Bouligand dimension of the set A − A of differences between elements of A. Given any compact set A ⊆ R N such that dim b (A − A) < m, then almost every orthogonal projection P of A of rank m is injective on A and P | A has Lipschitz continuous inverse except for a logarithmic correction term.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(22 reference statements)
2
31
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This means there is some > 0 such that (2.1) holds for all 0 < ρ < r < . Similar arguments to those given in Olson [17] show that the notions of almost homogeneous and locally almost homogeneous are equivalent when…”
Section: Aside: Compact Spaces and Local Versions Of (Almost) Homogensupporting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This means there is some > 0 such that (2.1) holds for all 0 < ρ < r < . Similar arguments to those given in Olson [17] show that the notions of almost homogeneous and locally almost homogeneous are equivalent when…”
Section: Aside: Compact Spaces and Local Versions Of (Almost) Homogensupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Unfortunately homogeneity of X is not automatically inherited by X − X: Olson [17] exhibits an example of a set X with d A (X) = 0 but for which d A (X − X) = +∞ (for more see Section 7). Proof.…”
Section: Almost Bi-lipschitz Embeddingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even then, dim A (A) < ∞ still does not imply that dim A (A − A) < ∞ (see Olson (2002)). The only attractors known to satisfy this condition are those that are subsets of inertial manifolds; but, of course, in this case, a finitedimensional system of ODEs that reproduces the behaviour on A is already known to exist, making this class of examples of little interest.…”
Section: Embedding the Dynamics On A Into Euclidean Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…where N (r, ρ) is the number of ρ-balls required to cover any r-ball in A (see Olson [11] for proof). For a more comprehensive treatment of the Assouad dimension see Luukkainen [8].…”
Section: Theorem 16 (See Robinson [14]) Let X Be a Compact Subset mentioning
confidence: 99%