1981
DOI: 10.1016/0040-1951(81)90070-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bouguer anomalies and crustal structure in the Eastern Mediterranean

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In approximate terms, we suggest, based on the Bouguer gravity data, the presence of an anomalous dense, thicker crust varying between 33 and 37.5 km in thickness in the study area. The thickness of the crust was also found to be approximately 36 km based on Bouguer gravity data from southern Turkey (Riad et al, 1981). Inversion of the magnetotelluric data across the Taurides of SW Anatolia provided an invaluable insight into the variations in depth of the transition from resistive upper crust to conductive lower crust (Gurer et al, 2004).…”
Section: Analysis and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In approximate terms, we suggest, based on the Bouguer gravity data, the presence of an anomalous dense, thicker crust varying between 33 and 37.5 km in thickness in the study area. The thickness of the crust was also found to be approximately 36 km based on Bouguer gravity data from southern Turkey (Riad et al, 1981). Inversion of the magnetotelluric data across the Taurides of SW Anatolia provided an invaluable insight into the variations in depth of the transition from resistive upper crust to conductive lower crust (Gurer et al, 2004).…”
Section: Analysis and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We use here the Bouguer anomaly map to determine the thickness of the crust (Riad et al, 1981). The relation with the average gravity and the thickness of the crust is given by Riad et al (1981):…”
Section: Analysis and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Riad et al 1981;Riad and El Etr 1985;Rivero et al 2002;Tirel et al 2004) to calculate crustal thicknesses from the gravity anomalies. Most optimum relation for the crustal thickness of Turkey is the equation given by Riad et al (1981) as follows:…”
Section: Gravity Anomalies and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible to find out different empirical equations proposed by different authors in the literature to calculate crustal thicknesses from the gravity anomalies (ie., Riad et al, 1981;Riad and El Etr, 1985;Rivero et al, 2002;Tirel et al, 2004). The equation given by Riad et al (1981) was preferred in this investigation because the following Equation (1) was tested in Turkey by Ates et al (2012) and, its accuracy was verified by correlating with all previous crustal thickness investigation results in the onshore areas (Ates et al, 2012):…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%