“…In 2003, Whittaker et al [22] used BoNT (2.5 to 5 U) to treat patients with functional epiphora and found that 8/11 (72.7%) patients had subjective and objective improvement in epiphora severity. In response to Whittaker et al [22], some studies performed BoNT treatment (1.25 to 7.5 U) in patients with lacrimal outflow obstruction, including canalicular obstruction, punctal occlusion, and nasolacrimal duct obstruction, and reported an overall satisfaction rate of 70% [23,24,25,26,27,28]. Compared to conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy (CDCR), a complete bypass of the lacrimal drainage system from inferior half of the caruncle to the middle nasal meatus, intraglandular BoNT (4 U) injection had superior accessibility, safety, reversibility, and technical simplicity [27].…”