2013
DOI: 10.1111/jcom.12067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bottom-Up Technology Transmission Within Families: Exploring How Youths Influence Their Parents' Digital Media Use With Dyadic Data

Abstract: This study investigated the bottom‐up technology transmission process in a country with varied levels of technology diffusion, such as Chile. It explored to what extent children teach their parents how to use digital media and proposed a typology of factors related to this process. By relying on a mixed‐methods design—which combined interviews with an original survey—and dyadic data, it found that the transmission occurs for all the technologies investigated, although children's influence should not be oversta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
86
1
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(85 reference statements)
2
86
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Instances of two-way interactions between parent and child merit special attention in future work. Our results on participatory learning and the various buddy styles suggest the existence of less hierarchical and less riskavoidance, more opportunity-seeking mediation styles (see also e.g., Clark, 2011b) or even reversed socialization relationships through processes of bottom-up technology transmissions (Correa, 2014). Moreover, this study exemplifies how the precursors of PM that have been extensively reported, like the demographic variables of parent and child (see e.g., Gentile et al, 2012;Mendoza, 2009;Nikken & Jansz, 2006), are to be understood in their dialectical relation to various contextual factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Instances of two-way interactions between parent and child merit special attention in future work. Our results on participatory learning and the various buddy styles suggest the existence of less hierarchical and less riskavoidance, more opportunity-seeking mediation styles (see also e.g., Clark, 2011b) or even reversed socialization relationships through processes of bottom-up technology transmissions (Correa, 2014). Moreover, this study exemplifies how the precursors of PM that have been extensively reported, like the demographic variables of parent and child (see e.g., Gentile et al, 2012;Mendoza, 2009;Nikken & Jansz, 2006), are to be understood in their dialectical relation to various contextual factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Consistent with a contextualized approach, children may also influence their parent’s media use, with research indicating that the transfer of technological knowledge concerning computers, mobile phones and the internet may not only operate in a top–down fashion (from parent to child) but also in a bottom–up manner: from child to parent (Correa, 2014). Findings indicate that the active sharing of knowledge is influenced strongly by traditional demographic factors such as gender and social class, i.e., women/mothers are more likely to gain knowledge from their children and the influence of child knowledge is greater in families with lower socioeconomic status.…”
Section: Family Digital Literacy Practicesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These dimensions reflect the mediation styles and attitudes and preferences of parents and children and clearly demonstrate how parental practices help define the socio-technological ethos of the home, which in turn influences the use and preferences of the child. Recent evidence indicates that the home technology environment cannot only be shaped by parents, but that children themselves can play an active role in influencing the behaviors of family members by acting as “brokers” in the adoption of digital media in the home environment (Correa, 2014, p. 111). Further research with larger more representative samples is required to clarify the nature and processes that determine not only parental but also child influences within the home.…”
Section: Family Digital Literacy Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consumer behavior and marketing literature clearly demonstrates that children often play the role of change agents within the family structure and influence purchasing behaviors (Jenkins, 1979;Shoham & Dalakas, 2005;Swinyard & Sim, 1987;Wilson & Wood, 2004). Additionally, children are often the first to adopt new technologies within households and influence and instruct their parents in the utilization of these innovations (Belch, Krentler, & Willis-Flurry, 2005;Brown & Venkatesh, 2005;Correa, 2014;Götze, Prange, & Uhrovska, 2009). …”
Section: Child Influence On Parent Decision-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%