2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.08.161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bottom-up cost evaluation of SOEC systems in the range of 10–100 MW

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…in the steel industry [8]) and thus it will be necessary to utilize additional scaling effects. Significant cost reduction potential through up-scaling of plant production capacities for different PtG technologies were already identified by Parra et al [9,10] (alkaline and PEM electrolysis and methanation) and Anghilante et al [11] (solid-oxide electrolysis), and also considered the impacts of mass production. Gutiérrez-Martín et al [12] evaluated power-to-SNG technology in general for large-scale storage applications, indicating levelized costs of energy (LCoE) for SNG of 30-80 €/MWh, depending on presumed electricity costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in the steel industry [8]) and thus it will be necessary to utilize additional scaling effects. Significant cost reduction potential through up-scaling of plant production capacities for different PtG technologies were already identified by Parra et al [9,10] (alkaline and PEM electrolysis and methanation) and Anghilante et al [11] (solid-oxide electrolysis), and also considered the impacts of mass production. Gutiérrez-Martín et al [12] evaluated power-to-SNG technology in general for large-scale storage applications, indicating levelized costs of energy (LCoE) for SNG of 30-80 €/MWh, depending on presumed electricity costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…65 This method has been applied in various manufacturing industries. [65][66][67] Regarding energy technologies other than batteries, it has been used to project costs for fuel cells and electrolysers, 68,69 renewable energy technologies [70][71][72] and integrated energy systems. 73,74 In order to derive cost projections, the product is first separated into its individual components, required resources and processes are assigned, and cumulative cost are calculated.…”
Section: Authors and Yearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The C 0 value for the DAC section is chosen considering the expected development maturity of this technology in a 2040 scenario [19]. The SOE section cost is evaluated from the automated production scenario described in [37] (around 308 €/kW); this value is similar to capital expenditure outlook for 2040 (300 €/kW [40]). A conservative scale factor for system downsizing is then applied to calculate the cost for the 21.5 MW section.…”
Section: Cost Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%