2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2007.00298.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bottom or midwater: alternative foraging behaviours in adult female loggerhead sea turtles

Abstract: Intrapopulational polymorphism in habitat use is widely reported in many animal species. The phenomenon has recently also been recognized in adult female loggerhead sea turtles Caretta caretta, with small females tending to inhabit oceanic areas (where water depths are 4200 m) while presumably feeding pelagically and large females tending to inhabit neritic areas (where depths are o200 m) while presumably feeding benthically. In this study, dive recording satellite telemetry units were used to verify their for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
46
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 821 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(74 reference statements)
4
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Papi et al 1997;Limpus & Limpus 2001), where females stay for long periods feeding on benthic prey and to which they show fidelity in successive reproductive seasons ). The most recent results have, however, revealed numerous exceptions to this general pattern, including the possible prolonged residence of females in the oceanic habitat (Hatase et al 2002;Hawkes et al 2006;Hatase et al 2007;Rees et al 2010), suggesting the possibility of epipelagic feeding in adults (Reich et al 2010), the presence of seasonal migrations between different feeding and wintering areas (Hawkes et al 2007;Zbinden et al 2008Zbinden et al , 2011 or convoluted segments in the migratory routes (Dodd & Byles 2003;Hatase et al 2007;Hawkes et al 2007) of uncertain biological significance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Papi et al 1997;Limpus & Limpus 2001), where females stay for long periods feeding on benthic prey and to which they show fidelity in successive reproductive seasons ). The most recent results have, however, revealed numerous exceptions to this general pattern, including the possible prolonged residence of females in the oceanic habitat (Hatase et al 2002;Hawkes et al 2006;Hatase et al 2007;Rees et al 2010), suggesting the possibility of epipelagic feeding in adults (Reich et al 2010), the presence of seasonal migrations between different feeding and wintering areas (Hawkes et al 2007;Zbinden et al 2008Zbinden et al , 2011 or convoluted segments in the migratory routes (Dodd & Byles 2003;Hatase et al 2007;Hawkes et al 2007) of uncertain biological significance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This simple, rapid, non-invasive technique has the potential to advance our understanding of the enigmatic ecology of sea turtles. For example, although size-related differences in the use of feeding habitats (neritic vs. oceanic) by adult female loggerhead turtles have been reported within several populations (Hatase et al, 2002(Hatase et al, , 2007Hawkes et al, 2006), the mechanisms that produce and maintain this phenomenon are still unknown. Relative age information obtained with this method may become a key to help solve this phenomenon, which is closely related to facultative habitat shifts during ontogeny and alternative life histories in animals (Hatase et al, 2006;McClellan and Read, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the females appear to have high site fidelity to feeding areas , it may indicate that adults go back to the Sanriku coastal area after their breeding migration. According to tag-recapture data (Kamezaki et al 1997), the post-nesting females that nest in Yakushima migrate mainly to Japanese coastal areas and the East China Sea, whereas, according to satellite telemetry (Hatase et al 2007), some small adults migrate following the Kuroshio Current to the pelagic Pacific after nesting. These adult-sized loggerhead turtles migrating along the Kuroshio Current after their breeding migration may recruit to the Sanriku coastal area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As there are no genetic differences between neritic foragers and oceanic foragers within Minabe and Ya kushima rookeries, the difference in feeding strategy is assumed to indicate phenotypic plasticity (Watanabe et al 2011). Juveniles that use the oceanic feeding strategy after the transoceanic migration, originating from the southern rookeries and possibly from the northern rookeries, are considered to migrate along the Kuroshio Current, as do some oceanic postnesting adults nesting in Japan (Hatase et al 2002b(Hatase et al , 2007, analogous to the juveniles in the Atlantic migrating along the Gulf Stream (Mansfield et al 2009). When juveniles that are transported to the north in the Kuroshio Current encounter the Sanriku coastal area, they settle or at least opportunistically forage in this area because of its high productivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%