2017
DOI: 10.1101/172296
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bots for Software-Assisted Analysis of Image-Based Transcriptomics

Abstract: We introduce software assistants -bots -for the task of analyzing image-based transcriptomic data. The key steps in this process are detecting nuclei, and counting associated puncta corresponding to labeled RNA. Our main release offers two algorithms for nuclei segmentation, and two for spot detection, to handle data of different complexities. For challenging nuclei segmentation cases, we enable the user to train a stacked Random Forest, which includes novel circularity features that leverage prior knowledge r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3. Furthermore, all of our models, even those trained with fewer annotations, show better performances in terms of the NCS than do those (approximately 0.6) reported in [31].…”
Section: B Overall Performancementioning
confidence: 63%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…3. Furthermore, all of our models, even those trained with fewer annotations, show better performances in terms of the NCS than do those (approximately 0.6) reported in [31].…”
Section: B Overall Performancementioning
confidence: 63%
“…We evaluated the proposed method on the nucleus dataset published in [31]. The dataset contains fully annotated DAPI-stained cell nuclei, and we refer to it herein as DH100.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Cropped images of the dorsal striatum (962 × 1236 pixels) were analyzed in two ways. The number of Fos transcripts per image was analyzed by counting the number of fluorescent dots in the Cy5 channel using SpotsInNucleiBot developed in Matlab (Cicconet et al, 2017). The same sigma and threshold values were used for all samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%