Both trust in, and polarization of trust in, relevant sciences have increased through the COVID-19 pandemic

Abstract

While attempts to promote acceptance of well-evidenced science have historically focused on increasing scientific knowledge, it is now thought that for acceptance of science, trust in, rather than simply knowledge of, science is foundational. Here we employ the COVID-19 pandemic as a natural experiment on trust modulation as it has enabled unprecedented exposure of science. We ask whether trust in science has on the average altered, whether trust has changed the same way for all and, if people have responded differently, what predicts these differences? We 1) categorize the nature of self-reported change in trust in “scientists” in a random sample of over 2000 UK adults after the introduction of the first COVID vaccines, 2) ask whether any reported change is likely to be real through consideration of both a negative control and through experiment, and 3) address what predicts change in trust considering sex, educational attainment, religiosity, political attitude, age and pre-pandemic reported trust. We find that many more (33%) report increased trust towards “scientists” than report decreased trust (7%), effects of this magnitude not being seen in negative controls. Only age and prior degree of trust predict change in trust, the older population increasing trust more. The prior degree of trust effect is such that those who say they did not trust science prior to the pandemic are more likely to report becoming less trusting, indicative of both trust polarization and a backfire effect. Since change in trust is predictive of willingness to have a COVID-19 vaccine, it is likely that these changes have public health consequences.

What do people think about genetic engineering? A systematic review of questionnaire surveys before and after the introduction of CRISPR

“…The social media discussion of COVID-19 has made the question of whether what is disseminated is verified scientific information or misinformation/fake news increasingly critical. Radrizzani et al (2023) surveyed a sample of the United Kingdom public about how their trust in science had been affected by the introduction of the first COVID-19 vaccines. They found that it was much more common for people to report that not only their trust had increased than that it had decreased but also that trust decreased among those who had little trust in science to begin with.…”

A political psychology of the link between populist beliefs and compliance with COVID-19 containment measures

“…But equally, during the pandemic, many on the populist right (including groupings like "UsforThem") claimed that COVID measures represented the capture of policy by the "scientific establishment" against the interests of "the people" (Kingsley, 2023). Indeed, as the pandemic went on, views about science in the UK became increasingly politically polarized-although, absolute levels of support for science and scientists increased (Radrizzani et al, 2023).…”

Who Is Best Placed to Support Cyber Responsibilized UK Parents?

“…UK academics are generally trusted by the public [62]. The pandemic might easily have dented this trust [63] but luckily, the British Academy's recent study found that academics are still widely trusted [64]. Cybersecurity academics work with psychologists and computer scientists to understand how to deliver cybersecurity guidance to the public.…”