2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0091-3057(01)00686-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Both the shell of the nucleus accumbens and the central nucleus of the amygdala support amphetamine self-administration in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, inhibition of DA transmission within the amygdala reduces fear-potentiated startle (Greba & Kokkinidis, 2000), the retrieval of conditioned-fear associations (Nader & LeDoux, 1999), and has a general anxiolytic effect (de la Mora et al, 2005). On the other hands, rats self-administer damphetamine directly in the central nucleus of the amygdala (Chevrette et al, 2002), while DA transmission in the basolateral amygdala contribute to the establishment and reinstatement of instrumental and associative reward learning (Zarrindast et al, 2003;Andrzejewski et al, 2005;Alleweireldt et al, 2006). In sum, both positive and negative emotional behavioral dispositions appear to be stimulated by DA in the amygdala.…”
Section: Microinjections and Lesion Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, inhibition of DA transmission within the amygdala reduces fear-potentiated startle (Greba & Kokkinidis, 2000), the retrieval of conditioned-fear associations (Nader & LeDoux, 1999), and has a general anxiolytic effect (de la Mora et al, 2005). On the other hands, rats self-administer damphetamine directly in the central nucleus of the amygdala (Chevrette et al, 2002), while DA transmission in the basolateral amygdala contribute to the establishment and reinstatement of instrumental and associative reward learning (Zarrindast et al, 2003;Andrzejewski et al, 2005;Alleweireldt et al, 2006). In sum, both positive and negative emotional behavioral dispositions appear to be stimulated by DA in the amygdala.…”
Section: Microinjections and Lesion Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DA projections to the shell are more sensitive to a great variety of stimuli, including drugs of abuse (Pontieri et al, 1995), restraint and pharmacological stress (Deutch & Cameron, 1992;Horger et al, 1995;Kalivas & Duffy, 1995;, food, and novel stimuli or environments (Rebec et al, 1997;Rebec, 1998;Barrot et al, 2000). Moreover, microinjections of DA drugs into the medial shell, but not the core, support instrumental behaviors and CPP (Carlezon & Wise, 1996;Ikemoto et al, 1997;Chevrette et al, 2002;Sellings & Clarke, 2003). It is generally accepted that the shell is involved in mediating the rewarding effects of psychostimulants (Parkinson et al, 1999;RoddHenricks et al, 2002;Ito et al, 2004), but there is less agreement concerning the psychomotor activating effects of these drugs.…”
Section: The Nacc Core/shell Distinctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antagonism or Accumbens DA Depletion: Problems with the General DA/Reward Hypothesis Animals will self-administer stimulants directly into nucleus accumbens, and there is little disagreement with the idea that interference with accumbens DA transmission has profound effects upon stimulant self-administration (Roberts et al, 1977;Caine and Koob, 1994;Chevrette et al, 2002). Of course, there are disagreements as to the precise interpretation of these findings, the possible role of other transmitters or other brain regions, and the possible substrates for nonstimulant drugs of abuse.…”
Section: Preserved Aspects Of Primary Food Reinforcement and Food Motmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence indicating that accumbens DA is important for drug self-administration (e.g., Roberts et al 1977;Caine and Koob 1994;Chevrette et al 2002) does not provide direct support for the hypothesis that this system mediates the primary motivational effects of natural stimuli. The mesolimbic dopamine system is thought to promote behavioral activation, arousal, attention, conditioning, and other functions, and the drugrelated induction of these effects could lead to selfadministration but that does not necessarily mean that the primary function of the system in relation to natural stimuli is "reward" Everitt and Robbins 2005;Robbins and Everitt 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%