1986
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.83.17.6392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Both the 25-kDa and 50-kDa domains in myosin subfragment 1 are close to the reactive thiols.

Abstract: Both the 25-kDa and 50-kDa domains in myosin subfragment 1 are close to the reactive thiols (benzophenone-4- Communicated by Russell F. Doolittle, May 23, 1986 ABSTRACT The thiol-specific photoactivatable reagent benzophenone-4-iodoacetamide can be incorporated into myosin subfragment 1 (Si), accompanied by an increase of Ca2+-ATPase and the loss of K+-ATPase activities, a characteristic property of S1 when reactive sulfhydryl 1 (SH-1) Is modified. After trypsin cleavage, 25-kDa, 50-kDa, and 20-kDa fragment… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
22
0

Year Published

1988
1988
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(27 reference statements)
6
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some analogs, such as 3'-O-3(-N-(4-azido,2-nitrophenyl)amino)propionyladenosine-5'-triphosphate (Szilagyi et al, 1979) or N-(4-azido,2-nitroanilino)ethyl diphosphate (Okamoto & Yount, 1983) wer e incorporated into the N-terminal fragment, while others, such as 3'-O-(4-benzoyl)-benzoic-adenosine-5'-triphosphate (Mahmood & Yount, 1984;Srivastava et al, 1986), N-(4-azido,2-nitroanilino)ethyl triphosphate (Nakamaye et al, 1985) or 1-fluoro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (Hiratsuka, 1986a) specifically labelled the central fragment. These results suggest that although the 27K fragment contains information for nucleotide adenine binding, part of the 50K fragment may be located at or near the Muno et al, 1987Lu et al, 1986Chaussepied et al, 1986f Chaussepied et al, 1988Hiratsuka, 1984Rajasekharan et al, 1987 active site. Both the heavy chain and the light chain may contribute to the ATP binding site, as recently r• in srnooth muscle myosin .…”
Section: Investigation Using Nucleotide Analogsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Some analogs, such as 3'-O-3(-N-(4-azido,2-nitrophenyl)amino)propionyladenosine-5'-triphosphate (Szilagyi et al, 1979) or N-(4-azido,2-nitroanilino)ethyl diphosphate (Okamoto & Yount, 1983) wer e incorporated into the N-terminal fragment, while others, such as 3'-O-(4-benzoyl)-benzoic-adenosine-5'-triphosphate (Mahmood & Yount, 1984;Srivastava et al, 1986), N-(4-azido,2-nitroanilino)ethyl triphosphate (Nakamaye et al, 1985) or 1-fluoro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (Hiratsuka, 1986a) specifically labelled the central fragment. These results suggest that although the 27K fragment contains information for nucleotide adenine binding, part of the 50K fragment may be located at or near the Muno et al, 1987Lu et al, 1986Chaussepied et al, 1986f Chaussepied et al, 1988Hiratsuka, 1984Rajasekharan et al, 1987 active site. Both the heavy chain and the light chain may contribute to the ATP binding site, as recently r• in srnooth muscle myosin .…”
Section: Investigation Using Nucleotide Analogsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In myosin, as in adenylate kinase, this loop motion could alternately block and open the entrance to the pocket and/or alter the affinity of the site for ATP and ADP (Fry et al, 1986), as well as serving the critical function of communicating nucleotide binding to the actin-binding site. Motion in the head due to nucleotide binding is revealed by effects on crosslinking: the reactive sulphydryl SH1 in the 20 k region can be linked to the 25 k region in the absence of ATP, and also to the 50k region in the presence of nucleotide (Lu et al, 1986). Trapping the nudeotide favours 20-50 k crosslinking (Rajasekharan et al, 1987), probably by immobilizing the.…”
Section: Head Domains and Motionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Biochemical and biophysical evidence for intramolecular motion in myosin is available . For example, nucleotide binding to the myosin head causes internal motion that is reflected by changes in the pattern of cross-links that can be formed with SH, and by changes in proteolytic susceptibility of bonds (Lu et al, 1986;Applegate and Reisler, 1984) . Weak and strong binding states of actin also suggest nucleotide induced motion that dramatically alters actin binding affinity (Eisenberg and Greene, 1980) .…”
Section: Domain Structure and Models Ofmuscle Contractionmentioning
confidence: 99%