2000
DOI: 10.3386/w7761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Borrowing Constraints and the Returns to Schooling

Abstract: Carolina. We thank Tricia Gladden for superior research assistance and thoughtful comments. We also thankJeff Kling for providingus with his data. Forfinancial support, Taber acknowledges NSF Grant SBR-97-09-873, and Cameron acknowledges NSF Grants SBR-97-30-657. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Bureau of Economic Research. 02000 by Stephen Cameron and Christopher Taber. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
64
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This instrument has been used to estimate intergenerational schooling e ects, for example by Carneiro et al (2007) and it is related to the instrument used by Currie and Moretti (2003), who use college openings and closings as instruments for mother's schooling. In addition, college proximity has been used as an instrument for schooling by Card (1995), Kling (2001) and Cameron and Taber (2004). Table 5 show results whereby college proximity is used as an instrument in a 2SLS regression.…”
Section: Mtr-mts Assumption Not Rejectedmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This instrument has been used to estimate intergenerational schooling e ects, for example by Carneiro et al (2007) and it is related to the instrument used by Currie and Moretti (2003), who use college openings and closings as instruments for mother's schooling. In addition, college proximity has been used as an instrument for schooling by Card (1995), Kling (2001) and Cameron and Taber (2004). Table 5 show results whereby college proximity is used as an instrument in a 2SLS regression.…”
Section: Mtr-mts Assumption Not Rejectedmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Positive external effects of higher education, however, are difficult to establish empirically (see, e.g., Heckman and Klenow, 1997;Krueger and Lindahl, 1999;Acemoglu and Angrist, 1999). Moreover, capital market imperfections do not seem to be very important (see, e.g., Shea, 2000;Cameron and Taber, 2000). 1 Why, then, is education subsidized?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The District of Columbia and Maine are not included since the data set does not contain observations from these states. 9 Admittedly, these regressions do not necessarily identify the causal impact on study time. A natural attack would be to ask how students react when tuition policies change.…”
Section: Differences In Study Time Across Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%