Abstract:The purpose of this work is to investigate the boronizing kinetics of AISI M2 steel by using the integral diffusion model with consideration of boride incubation periods. This simulation model was established by solving the differential algebraic equations (DAE) resulting from the integral method in the temperature range of 1173 to 1323 K. By using a particular solution of the obtained DAE system, the values of boron diffusivities in the FeB and Fe2B layers were estimated. The estimated values of activation en… Show more
“…where R denotes the ideal gas constant (=8.314 J mol −1 K −1 ) and T the boriding temperature given in Kelvin. Table 5 gives a comparison between the reported values of boron activation energies for some steels with the present values found in this work [9,13,18,[22][23][24]26,32,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44]. At first glance, there are some differences in terms of activation energies.…”
Section: T (K)mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…This kinetic model [25,26] has been used to predict the layers' thicknesses of FeB and Fe 2 B formed on the surface of AISI M2 steel in case of a saturated matrix with boron atoms. Figure 1 shows in a schematic way the change in the boron concentrations across the FeB and Fe 2 B layers after a treatment time greater than the incubation period.…”
Section: Integral Diffusion Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 shows in a schematic way the change in the boron concentrations across the FeB and Fe 2 B layers after a treatment time greater than the incubation period. The terms [26]. The variable u(t) is the location of the (FeB/Fe 2 B) interface and v(t) that of the second interface (Fe 2 B/substrate).…”
Section: Integral Diffusion Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kinetically, different kinetic approaches have been established to control the growth kinetics of compact layers composed of Fe 2 B [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] or (FeB and Fe 2 B) [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] and formed on ferrous alloys. All these mathematical models help to select the optimum values of boride layers' thicknesses according to the requirements imposed by the utilization of these ferrous materials in the industry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this research paper, the integral method [25,26] with a new variable changes and the Dybkov model [25,28] were suggested for simulating the boronizing kinetics of AISI M2 steel in the range of 1173 to 1323 K by using the experimental results [23].…”
Two kinetic approaches (integral method and Dybkov method) have been applied for simulating the boriding kinetics of AISI M2 steel in the range of 1173 to 1323 K, by including the effect of incubation periods. For the integral method, a peculiar solution of the resulting system of differential algebraic equations (DAE) has been employed for assessing the diffusivities of boron in FeB and Fe2B. The boron activation energies in FeB and Fe2B have been deduced from both approaches and compared with the data taken from the literature. Furthermore, to experimentally extend the validity of both approaches, four additional boriding conditions obtained on the boronized samples at 1173, 1223, 1273 and 1323 K for 10 h were then used. The predicted boride layers’ thicknesses were confronted to the experimental values. Consequently, a satisfactory concordance was obtained when comparing the simulated layers’ thicknesses to the experimental values derived from the literature.
“…where R denotes the ideal gas constant (=8.314 J mol −1 K −1 ) and T the boriding temperature given in Kelvin. Table 5 gives a comparison between the reported values of boron activation energies for some steels with the present values found in this work [9,13,18,[22][23][24]26,32,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44]. At first glance, there are some differences in terms of activation energies.…”
Section: T (K)mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…This kinetic model [25,26] has been used to predict the layers' thicknesses of FeB and Fe 2 B formed on the surface of AISI M2 steel in case of a saturated matrix with boron atoms. Figure 1 shows in a schematic way the change in the boron concentrations across the FeB and Fe 2 B layers after a treatment time greater than the incubation period.…”
Section: Integral Diffusion Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 shows in a schematic way the change in the boron concentrations across the FeB and Fe 2 B layers after a treatment time greater than the incubation period. The terms [26]. The variable u(t) is the location of the (FeB/Fe 2 B) interface and v(t) that of the second interface (Fe 2 B/substrate).…”
Section: Integral Diffusion Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kinetically, different kinetic approaches have been established to control the growth kinetics of compact layers composed of Fe 2 B [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] or (FeB and Fe 2 B) [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] and formed on ferrous alloys. All these mathematical models help to select the optimum values of boride layers' thicknesses according to the requirements imposed by the utilization of these ferrous materials in the industry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this research paper, the integral method [25,26] with a new variable changes and the Dybkov model [25,28] were suggested for simulating the boronizing kinetics of AISI M2 steel in the range of 1173 to 1323 K by using the experimental results [23].…”
Two kinetic approaches (integral method and Dybkov method) have been applied for simulating the boriding kinetics of AISI M2 steel in the range of 1173 to 1323 K, by including the effect of incubation periods. For the integral method, a peculiar solution of the resulting system of differential algebraic equations (DAE) has been employed for assessing the diffusivities of boron in FeB and Fe2B. The boron activation energies in FeB and Fe2B have been deduced from both approaches and compared with the data taken from the literature. Furthermore, to experimentally extend the validity of both approaches, four additional boriding conditions obtained on the boronized samples at 1173, 1223, 1273 and 1323 K for 10 h were then used. The predicted boride layers’ thicknesses were confronted to the experimental values. Consequently, a satisfactory concordance was obtained when comparing the simulated layers’ thicknesses to the experimental values derived from the literature.
The present work is dealing with the modelling of boriding kinetics of AISI 316 steel in the temperature range 1123-1273 K. A diffusion model based on the integral method was used in order to investigate the kinetics of formation of FeB and Fe 2 B layers and that of diffusion zone formed on AISI 316 steel by considering the presence of boride incubation times. By using a particular solution of the resulting differential algebraic system, the diffusion coefficients in FeB, Fe 2 B and diffusion zone (DZ) were estimated as well as the corresponding values of activation energies. Finally, this present diffusion model has been experimentally validated for two additional boriding conditions (1243 K for 3 and 5 h of treatment). A good concordance was observed between the experimental and the simulated results in terms of layers' thicknesses.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.