1995
DOI: 10.1017/s0022143000034894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Borehole water-level variations and the structure of the subglacial hydrological system of Haut Glacier d’Arolla, Valais, Switzerland

Abstract: Late-summer subglacial water pressures have been measured in a dense array of boreholes in the ablation area of Haut Glacier d’Arolla, Switzerland. Interpolated surfaces of minimum diurnal water pressure and diurnal water-pressure variation suggest the presence of a subglacial channel within a more widespread, distributed drainage system. The channel flows along the centre of avariable pressure axis(VPA), some tens of metres wide, that is characterized by low minimum diurnal water pressures (frequently atmosph… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
180
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 220 publications
(201 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
20
180
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These values are consistent with hydraulic conductivity values reported for glacial sediments and similar materials (Freeze and Cherry, 1979;Lloyd, 1983;Fountain, 1992;Hubbard et al, 1995). Calculated values of hydraulic conductivity are lower in the morainic relief landsystem (1.1 to 27.4 m d − 1 ) with less variation than in the jökulhlaup and proglacial river channel landsystems (Table 1).…”
Section: Hydraulic Conductivitysupporting
confidence: 89%
“…These values are consistent with hydraulic conductivity values reported for glacial sediments and similar materials (Freeze and Cherry, 1979;Lloyd, 1983;Fountain, 1992;Hubbard et al, 1995). Calculated values of hydraulic conductivity are lower in the morainic relief landsystem (1.1 to 27.4 m d − 1 ) with less variation than in the jökulhlaup and proglacial river channel landsystems (Table 1).…”
Section: Hydraulic Conductivitysupporting
confidence: 89%
“…3) suggests a predominately hydrological control. Here, at minimum diurnal discharge, bulk discharge is comprised mostly of 'delayed-flow' waters from a relatively inefficient distributed system, that is then passed into the channellised system, due to the high pressure in the distributed system and the low pressure in the channellised system at this time (Hubbard et al, 1995). This promotes protracted, intimate contact with reactive subglacial sediments allowing more concentrated waters to evolve, as has been suggested for diurnal variations of major ion concentrations (Brown et al, 1994(Brown et al, , 1996a.…”
Section: Diurnal Controls Upon Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Reconstructed hydraulic gradients suggest that this interaction is driven by large diurnal water-pressure variations within the channel. During the day, high pressures in the channel drive water out to the distributed system, while low pressures overnight in the channel drive that water back (Hubbard et al, 1995). The weathering of suspended sediments within these water-filled subglacial channels contributes the majority of major ions present in bulk meltwaters emerging from the snout of Haut Glacier d'Arolla at the height of the ablation season (Brown et al, 1994;Brown et al, 1996a).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a stable channelized meltwater system is unlikely to form in soft substrate, temporary formation of channels to accommodate excess meltwater may occur (Boulton and Hindmarsh, 1987;Alley et al, 1989;Alley, 1993;Clark and Walder, 1994;Tulaczyk et al, 1998). Seasonal reorganization of flow, from distributed systems in winter to channelized flow in summer, is known from land-based glaciers (Hubbard et al, 1995), and the remnants of channels and tunnel valleys suggest that locally higher-energy meltwater streams capable of eroding soft glacial sediments also existed on the mid-to outer shelf within the large cross-shelf troughs ( Fig. 3; Lowe and Anderson, 2003;King et al, 2004;Wellner et al, 2006).…”
Section: Subglacial Meltwater Dischargementioning
confidence: 99%