“…In the United States, scholars have analysed the intermingling of criminal justice and immigration policing (Coleman, 2007;Martin, 2015); interior immigration enforcement resulting in detention and deportation (Coleman, 2009;Hiemstra, 2013;Mountz, Coddington, Catania, & Loyd, 2013); devolution of immigration inspections to local agencies (Varsanyi, Lewis, Provine, & Decker, 2012) and risk-based profiling and financial surveillance (Amoore, 2013;De Goede, 2012). In the European Union, migration and border policies have produced complex spatial dynamics: the bounding of Europe's Schengen Area (Prokkola, 2013;van Houtum, 2010); simultaneous freeing of internal mobility for EU citizens and 'hardening' of external boundaries (Huysmans, 2000;Vaughan-Williams, 2008); the harmonization of border and immigration controls as a condition of EU admission; Good Neighbor Agreements with non-EU members tying aid to immigration and border policing requirements (Casas-Cortes, Cobarrubias, & Pickles, 2013); and the expansion of long-term detention as a mobility control practice (Gill, 2009;Schuster, 2005). In Africa, Latin America, Eastern Europe and East Asia, critical inquiry has included well-documented transit zones (Collyer, 2012;Ferrer-Gallardo & Albet-Mas, 2013); externalized detention centres (Bialasiewicz, 2012;Mountz, 2011a); and the criminalization of detainees (Crush, 1999;Mainwaring, 2012) and deported people (Zilberg, 2011).…”