2020
DOI: 10.1080/13562576.2020.1773254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Borders resurgent: towards a post-Covid-19 global border regime?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…And that, albeit partially and selectively, national policy debates were embedded in transnationally shared notions of educational equity. Our findings confirmed the literature on transnational educational governance – pointing to attempts especially by non-state actors to engage in ‘governing by numbers’ building on metrics and data collected transnationally (Grek, 2020), but we could also clearly remark the resurgence of the nation state as a main policy actor during the crisis (Radil et al, 2021). This coexistence of different transnational and national orders is connected to the different spatio-temporalities (Lingard, 2021) in which state and non-state actors operated during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.…”
Section: Concluding Discussion: Policy Spaces and Temporalitiessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…And that, albeit partially and selectively, national policy debates were embedded in transnationally shared notions of educational equity. Our findings confirmed the literature on transnational educational governance – pointing to attempts especially by non-state actors to engage in ‘governing by numbers’ building on metrics and data collected transnationally (Grek, 2020), but we could also clearly remark the resurgence of the nation state as a main policy actor during the crisis (Radil et al, 2021). This coexistence of different transnational and national orders is connected to the different spatio-temporalities (Lingard, 2021) in which state and non-state actors operated during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.…”
Section: Concluding Discussion: Policy Spaces and Temporalitiessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This is line with recent studies that have highlighted their negative socioeconomic impacts, such as their threat to border integration in Europe, revival of territorial conflicts, xenophobia, and the often enduring negative emotional experiences of those who encounter them. 42 44 …”
Section: Overall Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, territorial borders cannot contain the impacts of wildfires, chemical pollution, ozone depletion, and most decidedly pandemics. States have responded by propping up their borders and emphasizing their boundaries (Radil, Castan Pinos, and Ptak 2020). Border walls, surveillance and other mechanisms of insulation all speak to this "border orientation" (Kenwick and Simmons 2020).…”
Section: Re-calibration Of the Border Studies Framework: Toward An Approximation Of Post-globalization Bordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, and more practically, border studies need to be in tune with rapidly evolving regimes of border policy worldwidein the European Union and with its neighbors, in China and its engagements with the rest of Asia, in the global south, in Polar regions, in North America, and even in the seemingly isolated Antipodes. The COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated the immediate adjustment of border policies worldwide (Radil, Castan Pinos, and Ptak 2020). Border studies specialists have responded with numerous surveys, research projects, re-articulations of research, and rapidly published articles to address the situation, and try to understand the consequences.…”
Section: Re-calibration Of the Border Studies Framework: Toward An Approximation Of Post-globalization Bordersmentioning
confidence: 99%