2017
DOI: 10.1080/15562948.2017.1302032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Borders, Fences, and Limits—Protecting Austria From Refugees: Metadiscursive Negotiation of Meaning in the Current Refugee Crisis

Abstract: The so-called refugee crisis presents a field of discursive struggle over meanings in politics. In Austria, mediatized politics in 2015 and 2016 was dominated by metadiscursive negotiation of terminology related to building a border fence and setting a maximum limit on refugees. Both issues raised serious ideological and legal concerns and were thus largely euphemized; as responses to ever-increasing pressure from the political right, however, they were also intended as signals to voters. This article presents… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0
7

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
54
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, these Eurosceptic sentiments have also gradually entered the political mainstream in many countries (Taggart and Szczerbiak 2018: 10;Börzel 2016). Rheindorf and Wodak (2018) demonstrate how the Austrian FPÖ's initial radical calls to limit the number of Schengens allowed to enter the country and to build a border fence became discursively normalised as they were adopted (in somewhat weaker form) by the mainstream conservative and social-democratic parties. A similar process occurred in Germany, where the AfD's framing of Schengens as cultural and security threats entered the mainstream as the Bavarian Christian Social Union and the Free Democrats tangibly moved to more exclusionary positions.…”
Section: Schengen Crisismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, these Eurosceptic sentiments have also gradually entered the political mainstream in many countries (Taggart and Szczerbiak 2018: 10;Börzel 2016). Rheindorf and Wodak (2018) demonstrate how the Austrian FPÖ's initial radical calls to limit the number of Schengens allowed to enter the country and to build a border fence became discursively normalised as they were adopted (in somewhat weaker form) by the mainstream conservative and social-democratic parties. A similar process occurred in Germany, where the AfD's framing of Schengens as cultural and security threats entered the mainstream as the Bavarian Christian Social Union and the Free Democrats tangibly moved to more exclusionary positions.…”
Section: Schengen Crisismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even mainstream parties aligned themselves more and more with this populist position. However, the Municipal Government, a coalition of the Socialist (SPÖ) and Green parties as well as Austria's then-President (also SPÖ) stood out in this counter discourse [23].…”
Section: Diversity Policy Of Viennamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die neue ÖVP übernimmt nachweislich wesentliche Forderungen der FPÖ in Bezug auf Migrations-und Flüchtlingspolitik und propagiert demensprechend eine äußerst restriktive Einwanderungspolitik (Rheindorf und Wodak 2017), das Schließen der Grenzen (sogar nach Italien und Südtirol) und der Mittelmeerroute. Schamlos wurden und werden sowohl von der FPÖ wie auch der neuen ÖVP viele Gerüchte, Strohmannargumente und Falschmeldungen über Migranten und Flüchtlinge verbreitet, die allesamt zu einem einzigen Bedrohungsszenario verschmelzen, bestehend aus einer fantasierten "Invasion" sogenannter "illegaler Migranten" (Ötsch und Horaczek 2017).…”
Section: Rechtsruck Im "Post-scham"-zeitalterunclassified