2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Borders and boundaries as resources for mobility. Multiple regimes of mobility and incoherent trajectories on the Ethiopian-Eritrean border

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has proven to be a fruitful analytical lens to further debunk the simplistic notion that the outcome of migration solely depends on a momentous go/no-go decision in a country of origin. With the focus on the journey, migration scholars have become sensitive to the non-linearity of migration processes (Mainwaring and Brigden 2016), the encounters between migrants and mobility regimes (Schapendonk et al 2018), the importance of serial decision-making (Crawley et al 2018; Van der Velde and van Naerssen 2011) and changing identities (Innes 2016), as well as undertheorised issues such as incoherence (Massa 2018) and chance (Gladkova and Mazzucato 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has proven to be a fruitful analytical lens to further debunk the simplistic notion that the outcome of migration solely depends on a momentous go/no-go decision in a country of origin. With the focus on the journey, migration scholars have become sensitive to the non-linearity of migration processes (Mainwaring and Brigden 2016), the encounters between migrants and mobility regimes (Schapendonk et al 2018), the importance of serial decision-making (Crawley et al 2018; Van der Velde and van Naerssen 2011) and changing identities (Innes 2016), as well as undertheorised issues such as incoherence (Massa 2018) and chance (Gladkova and Mazzucato 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have illustrated the contextual and situational character of self‐identification. For example, in her studies of Tigrinya‐speaking Eritrean refugees and Ethiopian returnees in Mekele (Ethiopia), Massa (2017, 2018) found that her participants mobilized different senses of belonging and identification contextually at various points of their life. Another empirical example of the contextual nature of self‐identification is Sökefeld's (1999) examination of a Pakistani man, Ali Hassan, in which the subject adopted various and at times contradictory identities in different social settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, these routes can hardly be captured through concepts such as the 'migratory journey' with supposedly well-separated phases of preparation, travel, transit, arrival and settlement (see Schapendonk et al, 2020). The approach to the mobility trajectories adopted in this article is therefore better suited, as it leaves more room for notions such as incoherence (Massa, 2018) or chance (Gladkova & Mazzucato, 2017), to show that cross-border mobility within and outside Africa does not necessarily result from a migration project, nor is it necessarily conceived as 'migration' by those undertaking those cross-border movements.…”
Section: Mobility and Migration In Mineralised West Africamentioning
confidence: 99%