Borderline Personality Traits in Nonclinical Young Adults

Fonseca‐Pedrero, Eduardo; Paíno, Mercedes; Lemos-Giráldez, Serafín; Sierra-Baigrie, Susana; González, María Paz García-Portilla; Bobes, Julio; Muñiz, José

doi:10.1521/pedi.2011.25.4.542

Cited by 36 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…No other statistically significant correlations were found between Turkish BPQ and age. These results were consistent with Fonseca-Pedrero et al's [22] reliability and validity of Spanish BPQ study, in which they found all the subscales of BPQ were positively correlated with each other.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Normative data and factorial structure of the Turkish version of the Borderline Personality Questionnaire (Turkish BPQ)

Ceylan

Köse

2017

Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Borderline personality disorder is a psychiatric condition, which is characterized by unstable interpersonal relationships, fear of abandonment, difficulties in regulating emotions, feeling of emptiness, chronic dysphoria and depression, and impulsivity and increased risktaking behaviors. In this present study, we aimed to translate and establish psychometric properties and factorial validity of the Borderline Personality Questionnaire (BPQ) in a representative Turkish university students sample and obtain normative data for future epidemiological and clinical studies in Turkey. Methods: Participants were 306 (201 females, 105 males) college students at the Hasan Kalyoncu University in Gaziantep, Turkey. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hasan Kalyoncu University. Sociodemographic information of the participants was collected and Turkish BEST, Turkish BPQ, BDI, PBQ, and State-Trait Anxiety scales were administered. All variables were screened for the accuracy of data entry, missing values, and homoscedasticity using SPSS version 23 for Windows. Results: The Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the Turkish BPQ were ranging from 0.46 to 0.81. The lowest alpha coefficient was observed for the Abandonment (0.46). For the whole scale, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was found to be 0.89. The test-retest (at after 1 month) correlation coefficients for Impulsivity, Affective Instability, Abandonment, Relationships, SelfImage, Suicide/Self-Mutilation, Emptiness, Intense Anger, and Quasi-Psychotic States were found to be 0.50, 0.77, 0.40, 0.68, 0.72, 0.48, 0.73, 0.74, and 0.62, respectively. A positive and statistically significant correlation was found between the Turkish BPQ and BEST (r = 0.337, p < .01), BDI (r = 0.375, p < .01), PBQ (r = 0. 322, r < 0.01), State Anxiety (r = 0.299, p < .01), and Trait Anxiety (r = 0.306, p < .01) scales. Principal axis factor analyzes with Promax rotation were performed and two-factor solution that accounted for 50.03% of the variance observed. Conclusions: Our results suggested that Turkish BPQ was a valid and reliable tool with a robust factorial structure to use in clinical population in Turkey. ARTICLE HISTORY

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Normative data and factorial structure of the Turkish version of the Borderline Personality Questionnaire (Turkish BPQ)

Ceylan

Köse

2017

Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…is an 80‐item self‐report measure assessing the nine borderline domains, as identified by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed., text rev., DSM‐IV‐TR; American Psychiatric Association, 2000). It contains dichotomous questions such as “I often feel empty inside” and “The people I love often leave me.” It has previously been used as a dimensional measure of borderline traits, with the subscales demonstrating adequate internal consistency ( α = .78–.93) (Fonseca‐Pedrero et al, ). Further, when used for the screening of outpatient youth with the disorder, it has compared favourably to comparable measures (Chanen et al, ).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It contains dichotomous questions such as "I often feel empty inside" and "The people I love often leave me." It has previously been used as a dimensional measure of borderline traits, with the subscales demonstrating adequate internal consistency (α = .78-.93) (Fonseca-Pedrero et al, 2011). Further, when used for the screening of outpatient youth with the disorder, it has compared favourably to comparable measures (Chanen et al, 2008).…”

Section: Materials and Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

The specificity of the biosocial model to borderline traits

Gill

Warburton

Beath

2018

Clinical Psychologist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background A number of theories have been proposed to account for the development of borderline personality disorder (BPD). The biosocial model considers emotional dysregulation to be central to the disorder, caused in turn by an emotionally vulnerable child being raised in an invalidating environment. This aetiological model is potentially too broad, as many of these constructs may be equally important to other mental health conditions, making the model non‐specific to BPD. Method We sought to contrast the explanatory value of the constructs identified by the biosocial model of BPD to an alternate form of psychopathology (chronic worry), using a nonclinical sample (N = 271), via the completion of self‐report questionnaires. Results Childhood emotional vulnerability had a similar relationship to chronic worry as to borderline traits, with emotional dysregulation playing an important role in both disorders. Contrary to the biosocial model′s predictions, the interaction effects between the childhood antecedents were not found to play an important role in either psychopathology. Conclusion The lack of an interaction effect between invalidating parenting and emotional vulnerability suggests that this aspect of the biosocial model may not be a strong predictor of BPD. Key elements of the biosocial model may have utility as more generic predictors of psychopathology.

show abstract

“…It contains nine subscales, one for each of the facets of BPD as per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fourth Edition Text Revision (DSM‐IV‐TR; American Psychiatric Association [APA], ). The subscales demonstrate adequate‐excellent internal consistency (α = .78 − .93; Fonseca‐Pedrero et al., ), and the measure has performed favourably when compared with other measures of BPD in the screening of outpatient youth for the disorder (Chanen et al., ).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Borderline Personality Questionnaire (BPQ; Poreh et al, 2006). The BPQ is a selfreport measure that has been previously used with nonclinical populations as a dimensional measure of borderline traits (Fonseca-Pedrero et al, 2011). It contains nine subscales, one for each of the facets of BPD as per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fourth Edition Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR; American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2000).…”

Section: Borderline Traitsmentioning

confidence: 99%