2014
DOI: 10.7863/ultra.33.4.705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Borderline Amniotic Fluid Index and Its Relation to Fetal Intolerance of Labor

Abstract: The findings of this study suggest that there is no difference in the rate of fetal intolerance of labor in pregnancies with a borderline AFI and those with a normal AFI. Pregnancies complicated by a borderline AFI are more likely to undergo antepartum testing, yet the benefit is unclear. Significantly more patients with a borderline AFI had underlying growth restriction, which may provide a useful tool for risk stratification in the management of a borderline AFI.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature search flow chart is presented in Appendix 4, Figure 36. We identified 11 studies [88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98] (including the POP study) that met our inclusion criteria, which involved a total of 37,848 patients. The study characteristics are presented in Appendix 4, Table 23.…”
Section: Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The literature search flow chart is presented in Appendix 4, Figure 36. We identified 11 studies [88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98] (including the POP study) that met our inclusion criteria, which involved a total of 37,848 patients. The study characteristics are presented in Appendix 4, Table 23.…”
Section: Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study characteristics are presented in Appendix 4, Table 23. Only the POP study 88 (n = 3387) included unselected pregnancies, three studies 91,97,98 (n = 1890) included low-risk pregnancies only and seven studies 89,90,[92][93][94][95][96] (n = 32,571) included mixed-risk pregnancies. Two studies 97 (n = 3817) were prospective and nine studies [89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96]98 (n = 34,031) were retrospective.…”
Section: Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Present study revealed the incidence of operative delivery was significantly higher in oligohydramnios group and borderline liquor compared to the normal group similar to Akshaya K et al 2 Shahida et al and Wood et al have shown no significant difference in the incidence of operative delivery in the borderline AFI group and normal group. 4,7 Fetal distress was found to be the most common indication for cesarean delivery in the oligohydramnios Thomas JS et al Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;7 (11):4615-4618 and borderline liquor groups compared to control group though not statistically significant similar as Akshaya K et al and Ashraf J et al 2,5 Several studies have reported significant increase in the incidence of LSCS and the indication for fetal distress among the oligohydramnios group and no significant difference in the borderline AFI group and normal group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,8 In present study, there was a significant increase in low birth weight babies among the oligohydramnios group when compared to borderline and normal liquor groups which was similar to Locatelli et al 11 Certain studies have reported increased incidence of IUGR among pregnancies with borderline liquor compared to those with normal liquor. 7,9…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies suggested that pregnancies with borderline AFI were associated with an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes . By contrast, other studies also found that there was no significant difference in pregnancy outcomes in terms of cesarean section for fetal distress, meconium‐stained amniotic fluid, or neonatal complications between women with a borderline AFI versus a normal AFI . Furthermore, borderline AFI in a term pregnancy is generally considered an indication for the induction of labor in routine clinical practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%