2008
DOI: 10.4219/gct-2008-760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bordering on Excellence: A Teaching Tool for Twice-Exceptional Students

Abstract: major goal of education is to provide all students with the opportunity to reach their potential. Although few are able to argue with this goal, twice-exceptional students, including some of our most gifted students, are often on the brink of excellence due to the unique blend of assets and deficits they exhibit. Teachers are challenged each day to find ways to empower those bright students who may be unable to write a complete sentence, even though they are able to participate actively in a class discussion. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adaptation of the survey consisted of reordering topically and rephrasing the items from the format of “I like talking with my teacher about my favorite subject” to “Talking with my teacher about my favorite subject.” The response regime was changed from a Likert-type scale to a two-pronged system of indicating used/not used in the participant’s educational experience, followed by how beneficial the strategy was/could have been ( very, somewhat, not beneficial ). Also, a number of the strategies Kanevsky (2011) used with her gifted (but not explicitly twice-exceptional) participants were replaced by strategies suggested in the literature (Assouline & Whiteman, 2011; Baum et al, 1991; Baum et al, 2001; Hannah & Shore, 2008; Hua, 2002; Jeweler et al, 2008; Nielsen, 2002; Pereles et al, 2009; VanTassel-Baska & Stambaugh, 2006; Silverman, 1989; Whitmore & Maker, 1985; Yssel et al, 2010) as particularly helpful for twice-exceptional students, for example, using strengths to circumvent weaknesses, using compensatory strategies, developing study skills. The compensatory, executive function and learning strategies of Reis et al (1997) were also included.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adaptation of the survey consisted of reordering topically and rephrasing the items from the format of “I like talking with my teacher about my favorite subject” to “Talking with my teacher about my favorite subject.” The response regime was changed from a Likert-type scale to a two-pronged system of indicating used/not used in the participant’s educational experience, followed by how beneficial the strategy was/could have been ( very, somewhat, not beneficial ). Also, a number of the strategies Kanevsky (2011) used with her gifted (but not explicitly twice-exceptional) participants were replaced by strategies suggested in the literature (Assouline & Whiteman, 2011; Baum et al, 1991; Baum et al, 2001; Hannah & Shore, 2008; Hua, 2002; Jeweler et al, 2008; Nielsen, 2002; Pereles et al, 2009; VanTassel-Baska & Stambaugh, 2006; Silverman, 1989; Whitmore & Maker, 1985; Yssel et al, 2010) as particularly helpful for twice-exceptional students, for example, using strengths to circumvent weaknesses, using compensatory strategies, developing study skills. The compensatory, executive function and learning strategies of Reis et al (1997) were also included.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%